Imputing Satellite-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth Using a Multi-Resolution Spatial Model and Random Forest for PM2.5 Prediction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Shihao Tang,et al. Estimation of hourly full-coverage PM2.5 concentrations at 1-km resolution in China using a two-stage random forest model , 2021 .
[2] F. Liang,et al. The 17-y spatiotemporal trend of PM2.5 and its mortality burden in China , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3] Edzer Pebesma,et al. Spatiotemporal Multi-Resolution Approximations for Analyzing Global Environmental Data , 2020, Spatial Statistics.
[4] Zongwei Ma,et al. Estimating daily ground-level PM2.5 in China with random-forest-based spatiotemporal kriging. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.
[5] Jungho Im,et al. Estimating ground-level particulate matter concentrations using satellite-based data: a review , 2020 .
[6] Supreme Champion Ram,et al. Overall , 2020, Definitions.
[7] Alexei Lyapustin,et al. Estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations in New York City at the neighborhood-scale: Implications for integrating non-regulatory measurements. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.
[8] Jonathan R. Bradley,et al. What is the best predictor that you can compute in five minutes using a given Bayesian hierarchical model , 2019, 1912.04542.
[9] J. Schwartz,et al. An ensemble-based model of PM2.5 concentration across the contiguous United States with high spatiotemporal resolution. , 2019, Environment international.
[10] Yang Liu,et al. A Bayesian ensemble approach to combine PM2.5 estimates from statistical models using satellite imagery and numerical model simulation. , 2019, Environmental research.
[11] Jun Yang,et al. Extreme gradient boosting model to estimate PM2.5 concentrations with missing-filled satellite data in China , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.
[12] Itai Kloog,et al. Gaussian Markov Random Fields versus Linear Mixed Models for satellite-based PM2.5 assessment: Evidence from the Northeastern USA , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.
[13] David G. Streets,et al. Using gap-filled MAIAC AOD and WRF-Chem to estimate daily PM2.5 concentrations at 1 km resolution in the Eastern United States , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.
[14] Alexei Lyapustin,et al. Impacts of snow and cloud covers on satellite-derived PM2.5 levels. , 2019, Remote sensing of environment.
[15] Alexei Lyapustin,et al. Estimation of daily PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Italy, 2013-2015, using a spatiotemporal land-use random-forest model. , 2019, Environment international.
[16] Baofeng Di,et al. A nonparametric approach to filling gaps in satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth for estimating ambient PM2.5 levels. , 2018, Environmental pollution.
[17] Qingyang Xiao,et al. Predicting monthly high-resolution PM2.5 concentrations with random forest model in the North China Plain. , 2018, Environmental pollution.
[18] Qingyang Xiao,et al. An Ensemble Machine-Learning Model To Predict Historical PM2.5 Concentrations in China from Satellite Data. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.
[19] Xuefei Hu,et al. Satellite‐Based Daily PM2.5 Estimates During Fire Seasons in Colorado , 2018, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.
[20] Jane Elith,et al. blockCV: an R package for generating spatially or environmentally separated folds for k-fold cross-validation of species distribution models , 2018, bioRxiv.
[21] Qingyang Xiao,et al. Full-Coverage High-Resolution Daily PM2.5 Estimation using MAIAC AOD in the Yangtze River Delta of China , 2018 .
[22] Dorit Hammerling,et al. A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Data , 2017, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics.
[23] Howard H. Chang,et al. The Potential Impact of Satellite-Retrieved Cloud Parameters on Ground-Level PM2.5 Mass and Composition , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[24] Ashley I. Naimi,et al. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning , 2017, bioRxiv.
[25] J. H. Belle,et al. Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.
[26] Zhongmin Zhu,et al. A Review on Predicting Ground PM2.5 Concentration Using Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth , 2016 .
[27] Yang Liu,et al. Evaluation of Aqua MODIS Collection 6 AOD Parameters for Air Quality Research over the Continental United States , 2016, Remote. Sens..
[28] J. Schwartz,et al. Spatiotemporal prediction of fine particulate matter using high-resolution satellite images in the Southeastern US 2003–2011 , 2016, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.
[29] Mark J. van der Laan,et al. Optimal Spatial Prediction Using Ensemble Machine Learning , 2016, The international journal of biostatistics.
[30] Armistead G Russell,et al. Improving the Accuracy of Daily PM2.5 Distributions Derived from the Fusion of Ground-Level Measurements with Aerosol Optical Depth Observations, a Case Study in North China. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.
[31] Allan C Just,et al. Satellite remote sensing in epidemiological studies , 2016, Current opinion in pediatrics.
[32] Lianne Sheppard,et al. Satellite-Based NO2 and Model Validation in a National Prediction Model Based on Universal Kriging and Land-Use Regression. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.
[33] Douglas W. Nychka,et al. Multiresolution Kriging Based on Markov Random Fields , 2015 .
[34] N. Hamm,et al. NONSEPARABLE DYNAMIC NEAREST NEIGHBOR GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS FOR LARGE SPATIO-TEMPORAL DATA WITH AN APPLICATION TO PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS. , 2015, The annals of applied statistics.
[35] J. Lelieveld,et al. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale , 2015, Nature.
[36] Andreas Ziegler,et al. ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R , 2015, 1508.04409.
[37] Matthias Katzfuss,et al. A Multi-Resolution Approximation for Massive Spatial Datasets , 2015, 1507.04789.
[38] D. Nychka,et al. A Multiresolution Gaussian Process Model for the Analysis of Large Spatial Datasets , 2015 .
[39] Robert C. Levy,et al. MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .
[40] Jonathan R. Bradley,et al. A comparison of spatial predictors when datasets could be very large , 2014, 1410.7748.
[41] A. Gelfand,et al. Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[42] L. Remer,et al. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .
[43] M. Garay,et al. Comparison of GEOS‐Chem aerosol optical depth with AERONET and MISR data over the contiguous United States , 2013 .
[44] Alan D. Lopez,et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.
[45] J. Schwartz,et al. Incorporating local land use regression and satellite aerosol optical depth in a hybrid model of spatiotemporal PM2.5 exposures in the Mid-Atlantic states. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.
[46] J. Schwartz,et al. Assessing temporally and spatially resolved PM2.5 exposures for epidemiological studies using satellite aerosol optical depth measurements , 2011 .
[47] H. Rue,et al. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .
[48] P. Gupta,et al. Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality: The Cloud-Cover Problem , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[49] N. Cressie,et al. Fixed Rank Filtering for Spatio-Temporal Data , 2010 .
[50] J. D. Tarpley,et al. The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .
[51] J. D. Tarpley,et al. Real‐time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project , 2003 .
[52] D. Jacob,et al. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology : Model description and evaluation , 2001 .
[53] A. Smirnov,et al. AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .
[54] Geoffrey M. Laslett,et al. Kriging and Splines: An Empirical Comparison of their Predictive Performance in Some Applications , 1994 .
[55] Mark J. van der Laan,et al. Super Learner In Prediction , 2010 .
[56] Leo Breiman,et al. Stacked regressions , 2004, Machine Learning.
[57] L. Breiman. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.