This paper provides the first detailed presentation of the derivation for a newly proposed method which can be used for the decomposition of the stability buckling modes of a single-branched, open cross-section, thin-walled member into pure buckling modes. Thin-walled members are generally thought to have three pure buckling modes (or types): global, distortional, and local. However, in an analysis the member may have hundreds or even thousands of buckling modes, as general purpose models employing shell or plate elements in a finite element or finite strip model require large numbers of degrees of freedom, and result in large numbers of buckling modes. Decomposition of these numerous buckling modes into the three buckling types is typically done by visual inspection of the mode shapes, an arbitrary and inefficient process at best. Classification into the buckling types is important, not only for better understanding the behavior of thin-walled members, but also for design, as the different buckling types have different post-buckling and collapse responses. The recently developed generalized beam theory provides an alternative method from general purpose finite element and finite strip analyses that includes a means to focus on buckling modes which are consistent with the commonly understood buckling types. In this paper, the fundamental mechanical assumptions of the generalized beam theory are identified and then used to constrain a general purpose finite strip analysis to specific buckling types, in this case global and distortional buckling. The constrained finite strip model provides a means to perform both modal identification relevant to the buckling types, and model reduction as the number of degrees of freedom required in the problem can be reduced extensively. Application and examples of the derivation presented here are provided in a companion paper.
[1]
R. Schardt.
Verallgemeinerte Technische Biegetheorie
,
1989
.
[2]
Dinar Camotim,et al.
NONLINEAR GENERALIZED BEAM THEORY FOR COLD-FORMED STEEL MEMBERS
,
2003
.
[3]
J Bruneau,et al.
THE FINITE STRIP METHOD
,
1976
.
[4]
Sándor Ádány,et al.
BUCKLING MODE CLASSIFICATION OF MEMBERS WITH OPEN THIN-WALLED CROSS- SECTIONS BY USING THE FINITE STRIP METHOD
,
2004
.
[5]
Benjamin W. Schafer,et al.
Buckling mode decomposition of single-branched open cross-section members via finite strip method: Application and examples
,
2006
.
[6]
Gregory J. Hancock,et al.
Computer analysis of thin-walled structural members
,
1995
.
[7]
J. M. Davies,et al.
Second-order generalised beam theory
,
1994
.
[8]
Dinar Camotim,et al.
Second-order generalised beam theory for arbitrary orthotropic materials
,
2002
.
[9]
Mark A. Bradford,et al.
Buckling of plates with different end conditions using the finite strip method
,
1995
.
[10]
J. M. Davies,et al.
First-order generalised beam theory
,
1994
.