Identifying learning difficulties with fractions: A longitudinal study of student growth from third through sixth grade

Abstract The present longitudinal study examined growth in fraction knowledge between third and sixth grades (N = 536). Students were administered fraction concepts and procedures measures twice yearly through sixth grade. Analyses revealed empirically distinct growth classes on both measures. Of particular interest were students who started low and made little progress after three years of instruction in fractions, compared to those who started low but made good progress. Poorer language, attention, whole number line estimation, and calculation fluency in third grade significantly increased the odds of membership in a low-growth trajectory class for fraction concepts, while poorer attention and calculation fluency predicted membership in a low-growth trajectory class for fraction procedures. Students classified as receiving special education services in school, many of whom had diagnosed learning disabilities, were 2.5 times more likely to experience low growth in fraction concepts than their peers who were not receiving special education and 11.5 times more likely to experience low growth in fraction procedures. Students with persistent difficulties in fraction knowledge also were much less likely to meet state standards on a mathematics achievement test, portending problems in more advanced mathematics.

[1]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Number sense growth in kindergarten: a longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. , 2006, Child development.

[2]  S. Vosniadou.  Examining cognitive development from a conceptual change point of view: The framework theory approach , 2014 .

[3]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  S. Hecht,et al.  Patterns of strengths and weaknesses in children's knowledge about fractions. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain specificity and epigenesis. , 1998 .

[7]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Parts and 'holes': gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. , 2008, Developmental science.

[8]  Susan Carey,et al.  Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Modeling the developmental trajectories of rational number concept(s) , 2015 .

[10]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Early math matters: kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[11]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[12]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Using Kindergarten Number Sense to Predict Calculation Fluency in Second Grade , 2008, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Improving At-Risk Learners' Understanding of Fractions , 2013 .

[14]  David C. Geary,et al.  Development of Mathematical Understanding. , 2007 .

[15]  R. Murnane,et al.  The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination , 1995 .

[16]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[17]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review , 2021, The Development of Mathematical Skills.

[18]  Kristin E. Voelkl,et al.  Disruptive and Inattentive-Withdrawn Behavior and Achievement among Fourth Graders , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[19]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Mathematical Thinking in Second-Grade Children with Different Forms of LD , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  Steven A Hecht,et al.  Sources of Group and Individual Differences in Emerging Fraction Skills. , 2010, Journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Representational change and children’s numerical estimation , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude–treatment interaction. , 2014 .

[23]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  General and math-specific predictors of sixth-graders’ knowledge of fractions ☆ , 2015 .

[24]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: the role of the linear number line. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[25]  H. Swanson.  Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: A longitudinal study of elementary school children. , 2011 .

[26]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Pamela M. Seethaler,et al.  The Cognitive Predictors of Computational Skill with Whole versus Rational Numbers: An Exploratory Study. , 2011, Learning and individual differences.

[30]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  How Many Decimals Are There Between Two Fractions? Aspects of Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Rational Numbers and Their Notation , 2010 .

[31]  Tony Jung,et al.  An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. , 2008 .

[32]  Robert S Siegler,et al.  Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. , 2014, Developmental science.

[33]  A. Dowker.  Individual Differences in Arithmetic , 2012 .

[34]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach☆ , 1982 .

[35]  Kikumi K. Tatsuoka,et al.  Computerized Cognitive Diagnostic Adaptive Testing: Effect on Remedial Instruction as Empirical Validation , 1997 .

[36]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Fraction Skills and Proportional Reasoning , 2007 .

[37]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process. , 2001 .

[38]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems , 2006 .

[39]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty. , 2005 .

[40]  Janet B W Williams.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[41]  Ilyse Resnick,et al.  Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[42]  P. Bryant,et al.  Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. , 2010 .

[43]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  An Integrative Theory of Numerical Development. , 2014 .

[44]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Inhibiting natural knowledge in fourth graders: towards a comprehensive test instrument , 2015 .

[45]  M. Alibali,et al.  Variability in the natural number bias: Who, when, how, and why , 2015 .

[46]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: a longitudinal investigation. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[48]  R. Siegler,et al.  Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement , 2012, Psychological science.

[49]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Intervention Effects for Students With Comorbid Forms of Learning Disability , 2013, Journal of learning disabilities.

[50]  Catherine Willard,et al.  An Examination of the Ways That Students with Learning Disabilities Solve Fraction Computation Problems , 2014, The Elementary School Journal.

[51]  D. Geary.  Mathematics and Learning Disabilities , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[52]  Hank Fien,et al.  When Mobility Disrupts Learning. , 2008 .

[53]  Aryn A Pyke,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[54]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[55]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  The Two High-School Pillars Supporting College Science , 2007, Science.

[56]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Achievement Growth in Children With Learning Difficulties in Mathematics: Findings of a Two-Year Longitudinal Study , 2002 .

[57]  Kikumi K. Tatsuoka,et al.  Analysis of Errors in Fraction Addition and Subtraction Problems. Final Report. , 1984 .

[58]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence , 2014 .

[59]  C. A. Rashotte,et al.  Test of Word Reading Efficiency , 1999 .

[60]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Early fraction calculation ability. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[61]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[63]  Steven A. Hecht,et al.  Toward an information processing account of individual differences in fraction skills , 1998 .

[64]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Sources of individual differences in children's understanding of fractions. , 2014, Child development.

[65]  Steven A Hecht,et al.  Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[66]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[67]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.