Making Sense of Ecotoxicological Test Results: Towards Application of Process-based Models

The environmental risk of chemicals is routinely assessed by comparing predicted exposure levels to predicted no-effect levels for ecosystems. Although process-based models are commonly used in exposure assessment, the assessment of effects usually comprises purely descriptive models and rules-of-thumb. The problems with this approach start with the analysis of laboratory ecotoxicity tests, because only a limited amount of information is extracted. Standard summary statistics (NOEC, ECx, LC50) are of limited use in part because they change with exposure duration in a manner that varies with the tested species and the toxicant. As an alternative, process-based models are available. These models allow for toxicity measures that are independent of exposure time, make efficient use of the available data from routine toxicity tests, and are better suited for educated extrapolations (e.g., from individual to population, and from continuous to pulse exposure). These capabilities can be used to improve regulatory decisions and allow for a more efficient assessment of effects, which ultimately will reduce the need for animal testing. Process-based modeling also can help to achieve the goals laid out in REACH, the new strategy of the European Commission in dealing with chemicals. This discussion is illustrated with effects data for Daphnia magna, analyzed by the DEBtox model.

[1]  Terry W. Snell,et al.  Using probability of extinction to evaluate the ecological significance of toxicant effects , 2000 .

[2]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: The deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals , 1984 .

[3]  Mark Crane,et al.  What level of effect is a no observed effect? , 2000 .

[4]  Roland Fisch,et al.  Report of the OECD Workshop on Statistical Analysis of Aquatic Toxicity Data , 1998 .

[5]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems , 2000 .

[6]  S.A.L.M. Koouman Parametric analyses of mortality rates in bioassays , 1981 .

[7]  Hv Amsterdam Statistical Analysis of Bioassays, based on hazard modeling , 1994 .

[8]  P. Calow,et al.  Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population‐level effects in ecotoxicology? , 1999 .

[9]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  An alternative for NOEC exists, but the standard model has to be abandoned first , 1996 .

[10]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Ecological Risk Estimation , 1992 .

[11]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Responses to stress of Caenorhabditis elegans populations with different reproductive strategies , 2005 .

[12]  Michael C. Newman,et al.  Risk Assessment: Logic and Measurement , 1998 .

[13]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Analysis of toxicity tests on fish growth , 1996 .

[14]  S. Kooijman,et al.  Analysis of bioassays with time-varying concentrations. , 2001, Water research.

[15]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  No-effect concentrations in algal growth inhibition tests , 1996 .

[16]  Munn Sharon j.,et al.  Assessment Tools under the New Europena Union Chemicals Policy , 2003 .

[17]  J. Giddings,et al.  Effects analysis of time‐varying or repeated exposures in aquatic ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[18]  E. Heugens,et al.  Predicting effects of multiple stressors on aquatic biota. , 2003 .

[19]  Ryszard Laskowski,et al.  Some good reasons to ban the use of NOEC, LOEC and related concepts in ecotoxicology , 1995 .

[20]  M. C. Newman,et al.  The individual tolerance concept is not the sole explanation for the probit dose‐effect model , 2000 .

[21]  D. Mackay,et al.  Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Body Residues and Modes Of Toxic Action , 1993 .

[22]  S. Kooijman,et al.  On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: The deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals , 1983, Hydrobiological Bulletin.

[23]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic measures for exotoxicity. , 1998 .

[24]  J. B. Sprague Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish—III: Sublethal effects and “safe” concentrations , 1971 .

[25]  Tjalling Jager,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of multiple end points in life-cycle toxicity tests. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  P. Chapman,et al.  A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment , 1998 .

[27]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology , 1993 .

[28]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Effort‐allocation analysis of the seven‐day fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) and Ceriodaphnia dubia toxicity tests , 1991 .

[29]  T. Crommentuijn,et al.  Life-table study with the springtail Folsomia candida ( Willem ) exposed to cadmium, chlorpyrifos and triphenyltin hydroxide , 1997 .

[30]  Tjalling Jager,et al.  Modeling receptor kinetics in the analysis of survival data for organophosphorus pesticides. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  B W Kooi,et al.  The relationship between elimination rates and partition coefficients. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[32]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  S. Kooijman,et al.  From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. , 2000 .

[34]  N. M. van Straalen,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of contaminants in soil. , 1997 .

[35]  J. B. Sprague Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish I. Bioassay methods for acute toxicity , 1969 .

[36]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Modelling nematode life cycles using dynamic energy budgets , 2005 .

[37]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[38]  S. Kooijman,et al.  Quantitative aspects of metabolic organization: a discussion of concepts. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[39]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Analysis of toxicity tests on Daphnia survival and reproduction , 1996 .

[40]  S. Kooijman,et al.  Statistical analysis of bioassays, based on hazard modelling , 1994, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[41]  Peter Calow,et al.  Erratum: Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? (Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18 (1544-1556)) , 1999 .

[42]  D. Mackay,et al.  ENHANCING ECOTOXICOLOGICAL MODELING AND ASSESSMENT , 1993 .

[43]  A. Hendriks,et al.  Temperature-dependent effects of cadmium on Daphnia magna: accumulation versus sensitivity. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Eric P. Smith,et al.  Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: statistical and ecological concerns , 1993, Ecotoxicology.

[45]  N. Hoeven How to measure no effect. Part III: Statistical aspects of NOEC, ECx and NEC estimates , 1997 .