Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma.

BACKGROUND Nivolumab (a programmed death 1 [PD-1] checkpoint inhibitor) and ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4] checkpoint inhibitor) have been shown to have complementary activity in metastatic melanoma. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, nivolumab alone or nivolumab plus ipilimumab was compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS We assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, 945 previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma to nivolumab alone, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or ipilimumab alone. Progression-free survival and overall survival were coprimary end points. Results regarding progression-free survival are presented here. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9 to 16.7) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, as compared with 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.4) with ipilimumab (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.42; 99.5% CI, 0.31 to 0.57; P<0.001), and 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 9.5) with nivolumab (hazard ratio for the comparison with ipilimumab, 0.57; 99.5% CI, 0.43 to 0.76; P<0.001). In patients with tumors positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), the median progression-free survival was 14.0 months in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in the nivolumab group, but in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, progression-free survival was longer with the combination therapy than with nivolumab alone (11.2 months [95% CI, 8.0 to not reached] vs. 5.3 months [95% CI, 2.8 to 7.1]). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 16.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group, 55.0% of those in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group, and 27.3% of those in the ipilimumab group. CONCLUSIONS Among previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma, nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than ipilimumab alone. In patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade was more effective than either agent alone. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

[1]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma , 2015, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[2]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Survival, response duration, and activity by BRAF mutation (MT) status of nivolumab (NIVO, anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) and ipilimumab (IPI) concurrent therapy in advanced melanoma (MEL). , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Michael A. Davies,et al.  Pathways and therapeutic targets in melanoma , 2014, Oncotarget.

[5]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[11]  J. Allison,et al.  PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  C. Horak,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Utikal,et al.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  I. Mellinghoff Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University Curriculum vitae and Bibliography , 2014 .

[16]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.