The influence of context on word order processing – An fMRI study

Abstract In languages that have subject-before-object as their canonical word order, e.g. German, English and Danish, behavioral experiments have shown more processing difficulties for object-initial clauses (OCs) than for subject-initial clauses (SCs). For processing of OCs in such languages, neuroimaging experiments have shown more activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (L-IFG) compared to SCs. The increased activation in L-IFG has been explained in terms of syntactic transformation demands, increased argument hierarchization demands, and increased load on working memory. Behavioral findings have indicated that context may facilitate syntactic processing, but it has not been investigated whether a supportive context can decrease the activity in L-IFG. With L-IFG as a region of interest (ROI), the present fMRI study of 21 Danish participants investigated how a supportive linguistic context would affect the processing of Danish main clauses with either an initial subject or an initial object. We found more activity in BA 44, BA 45 and BA 47 for OCs compared to SCs. The processing of Danish OCs is thereby seen to elicit effects in L-IFG comparable to previously investigated languages. The context manipulation showed reduced activity in BA 47 for SCs and OCs occurring after a supportive linguistic context, suggesting less pragmatic processing difficulties for sentence processing in a supportive context. Outside the ROI, the lack of context affected several regions in both the frontal, temporal and parietal lobes.

[1]  Mikkel Wallentin,et al.  The locative alternation: Distinguishing linguistic processing cost from error signals in Broca's region , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[3]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Contextual Licensing of Marked OVS Word Order in German  , 2011, Linguistische Berichte (LB).

[4]  Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen Erik Hansen og Lars Heltoft: Grammatik over det danske sprog , 2011 .

[5]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[6]  Van Berkum,et al.  The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad - Any implications for neuropragmatics? , 2010 .

[7]  Markus Bader,et al.  Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison , 1999 .

[8]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The Role of Contrast in the Local Licensing of Scrambling in German: Evidence from Online Comprehension , 2006, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[9]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  E. Dąbrowska,et al.  Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers , 2006 .

[12]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[14]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[16]  Mikkel Wallentin,et al.  Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review , 2009, Brain and Language.

[17]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  A. Friederici,et al.  Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing , 2003 .

[19]  D. Perani,et al.  Syntax without language: Neurobiological evidence for cross-domain syntactic computations , 2009, Cortex.

[20]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences: An fMRI study , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[21]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[22]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Mads Poulsen,et al.  Context Improves Comprehension of Fronted Objects , 2014, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Effects of Case Marking and Word Order on Sentence Parsing in Finnish: An Eye Fixation Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Basic notions of information structure , 2008 .

[28]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[29]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an fMRI study , 2022 .

[30]  Emiliano Ricciardi,et al.  Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[33]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .

[34]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse structure and relative clause processing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Kate Stewart,et al.  Starting points , 2020, SIGP.

[36]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Parallel memory systems for talking about location and age in precuneus, caudate and Broca's region , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  Natalia Slioussar,et al.  Processing of a Free Word Order Language: The Role of Syntax and Context , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[38]  M. Erb,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Lars Heltoft,et al.  Grammatik over det Danske Sprog , 1993 .

[40]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .