Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches?

BackgroundThe face of surgery has changed over the past two decades with the introduction of laparoscopic techniques. The majority of surgical specialties now perform minimally invasive procedures hence decreasing the scarring, pain, and infection historically associated with open surgery. To further reduce the invasiveness of surgery, new surgical techniques like Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and Single-Port Surgery (SPS) are under development. Despite investment from the medical device industry and enthusiasm from medical professionals, we must analyse patient preferences and expectations of these novel techniques. This analysis will help us establish the demand for such techniques and guide future resource allocation.MethodsA questionnaire-based study was derived to identify whether the concepts of innovative techniques are acceptable to the general population. Their preferences between different available surgical options were recorded along with their choices for new innovative techniques. This study was carried out face-to-face and by using an online survey. It comprised four questions based upon a hypothetical scenario of an acute appendicitis. All the data were captured in a prospective database and analysed using statistical software.ResultsA total of 750 participants from variable backgrounds took part in the study. NOTES or SPS without an established safety profile was accepted by 34.3% of patients. SPS was the most popular method followed by conventional laparoscopy. Open surgery and NOTES were the least preferred (ranked 1.78, 1.98, 2.94, and 3.27, respectively). Choosing between SPS and NOTES only, 80.6% opted for SPS, 11.8% NOTES, and 5.6% declined surgery. The most popular route of access for NOTES is oral (37.7%).ConclusionSingle-port surgery was the most preferred method and NOTES was the least preferred technique. This shows general acceptance of the concept of virtually scarless surgery but without using the natural orifices.

[1]  W. Bemelman,et al.  In vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). , 2008, Endoscopy.

[2]  J. Romanelli,et al.  Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With the TriPort System: A Case Report , 2008, Surgical innovation.

[3]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[5]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Talamini,et al.  NOTES: transvaginal cholecystectomy with assisting articulating instruments , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  Asge,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005. , 2006 .

[8]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland. , 1996, Gut.

[9]  Litynski Gs,et al.  Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: The Laparoscopic Breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988) , 1999, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[10]  Jihad H. Kaouk,et al.  Single‐port laparoscopic surgery: initial experience in children for varicocelectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[11]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[12]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. , 2008, European urology.

[13]  Robert H. Hawes,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  M. Talamini,et al.  Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  M. Talamini,et al.  Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  S. Varadarajulu,et al.  Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  A. Kubota,et al.  Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method. , 2001, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[18]  Shashikant Mishra,et al.  Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report , 2007, BJU international.

[19]  G Piskun,et al.  Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[20]  Adam Fiolka,et al.  Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  Deborah Bowman,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery , 2006 .

[22]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach. , 1993, Gut.

[23]  W. Wassef,et al.  Natural orifice translumenal surgery: from scales to symphonies , 2008, Current opinion in gastroenterology.