Evaluation of Five Simulation Models for Predicting Aldicarb and Bromide Behavior Under Field Conditions

Five pesticide simulation models (Chemical Movement in Layered Soils (CLMS), Method of Underground Solute Evaluation (MOUSE), Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM), Groundwater Leading Effects of Agriculture Management Systems (GLEAMS), and Leaching Estimation and Chemistry Model-Pesticides (LEACHMP)) were evaluated using data for the transport and transformation of aldicarb and bromide in the unsaturated zone. Although these models have been tested separately, to date no effort has been made to evaluate all of them using a comprehensive data set from a single field study. Model performance was evaluated based on their ability to predict: the depth of solute center of mass, solute dissipation, and solute concentration distributions within the soil profile. GLEAMS and MOUSE underestimated bromide and aldicarb dissipation, while the other models provided satisfactory predictions of both solute center of mass and pesticide degradation. None of the models accurately described measured solute concentration distributions. Recommendations are made for the selection and use of the models based on objective and subjective criteria including graphical analysis, objective functions, intended model use, and the difficulty in obtaining model input data.

[1]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Aldicarb degradation in sandy soils from different depths , 1988 .

[2]  W. B. Nixon,et al.  Comparison of pesticide root zone model predictions with observed concentrations for the tobacco pesticide metalaxyl in unsaturated zone soils , 1986 .

[3]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Spatial Variability of Pesticide Sorption and Degradation Parameters , 1986 .

[4]  Tom Addiscott,et al.  Concepts of solute leaching in soils: a review of modelling approaches , 1985 .

[5]  M. H. Diskin,et al.  A procedure for the selection of objective functions for hydrologic simulation models , 1977 .

[6]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Fate of Aldicarb in the unsaturated zone beneath a citrus grove , 1990 .

[7]  D. L. Nofziger,et al.  A microcomputer-based management tool for chemical movement in soil , 1986 .

[8]  R. Wagenet,et al.  Predicting the fate of nonvolatile pesticides in the unsaturated zone , 1986 .

[9]  R. E. Jessup,et al.  Development and verification of simulation models for describing pesticide dynamics in soils , 1982 .

[10]  W. Jury,et al.  Numerical analysis of solute transport during transient irrigation: 2. The effect of immobile water , 1989 .

[11]  Stephen C. Hern,et al.  Evaluation of Sesoil, Przm and Pestan in a laboratory column leaching experiment , 1986 .

[12]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  Groundwater Loadings by Controlled-Release Pesticides: A Gleams Simulation , 1989 .

[13]  Matthew Lorber,et al.  The Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to groundwater , 1985 .

[14]  Clark C.K. Liu,et al.  Simulation of Organic Chemical Movement in Hawaii Soils with PRZM: 2. Predicting Deep Penetration of DBCP, EDB, and TCP , 1989 .

[15]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[16]  Russell L. Jones,et al.  Comparison of computer model predictions with unsaturated zone field data for aldicarb and aldoxycarb , 1986 .

[17]  P. S. C. Rao,et al.  Modeling Pesticide Fate in Soils , 2018, Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts and Modeling.

[18]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .