Assessing Village Authenticity with Satellite Images: A Method to Identify Intact Cultural Landscapes in Europe

Abstract The village with its characteristic zones of different land use from the center to the periphery is a basic unit of Europe's cultural landscapes. However, loss of the authentic pre-industrial village structure characterized by a fine-grained structure of arable land and wooded grasslands is a threat to both cultural heritage and biodiversity in many rural landscapes. Therefore, it is important that the extent and rate of change of such authentic villages in a landscape can be monitored. We studied to what extent loss of authenticity with increasing time after abandonment can be assessed by quantitative analysis and visual interpretation of satellite images. The study was carried out in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland in 1999. Using Landsat Thematic Mapper data from 1998, both the grain size of landscape elements (size of fields) and land-cover composition (encroachment of shrub and forest) were quantitatively described 6 type villages representing different stages of deterioration of the authentic village structure. Historical maps were used to delineate the border of the villages and the former extension of forest and open land was measured. The present land use and the degree of abandonment expressed as grain size and forest encroachment were mapped using satellite data. Deterioration occurred along 2 transformation paths: abandonment and ultimately becoming forest, or intensified agriculture, respectively. To validate these results we classified 22 other villages in a 1000 km2 area by visual interpretation of the original satellite images into 1 of 4 types. We then collected historical data on human population changes over the past six decades. The classification of village authenticity was clearly related to the rate of human population decline. We address the importance of validating and applying this approach for rapid assessment of the authenticity of cultural landscapes in European regions being subject to ongoing as well as expected future change, related to expansion of the European Union. Finally, we argue that the village represents a scale at which integration of natural and social sciences is possible.

[1]  N. Pounds,et al.  An historical geography of Europe: Europe on the eve of the Industrial Revolution , 1990 .

[2]  C. Watkins,et al.  Ecological History of European Forests , 1998 .

[3]  Jan C. Malmgren,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of newts , 2001 .

[4]  R. Fuller,et al.  Local extinctions and changes in species richness of lowland farmland birds in England and Wales in relation to recent changes in agricultural land-use. , 2000 .

[5]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century , 2001 .

[6]  N. Weber.  Afforestation in Europe: Experiences and Future Possibilities , 1998 .

[7]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Focal species modeling for biodiversity conservation , 2000 .

[8]  Ari Nikula,et al.  The spacing of mature forest habitat in relation to species-specific scales in managed boreal forests in NE Finland. , 2000 .

[9]  P. Chylarecki,et al.  Woodpeckers as Indicators of Forest Bird Diversity , 2001 .

[10]  L. Balčiauskas,et al.  Biodiversity and sustainable forestry in European forests: How East and West can learn from each other , 1997 .

[11]  D. Chirot,et al.  Traditional Romanian Village Communities: The Transition from the Communal to the Capitalist Mode of Production in the Danube Region , 1980 .

[12]  Birgit H. M. Elands,et al.  Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses , 2001 .

[13]  Lee Hannah,et al.  Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set , 1995, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[14]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions , 2002 .

[15]  J. Hart.  Rural Landscape , 1999, Dictionary of Geotourism.

[16]  L. Head.  Cultural Landscapes and Environmental Change , 2000 .

[17]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The second Silent Spring? , 1999, Nature.

[18]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[19]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests , 2004 .

[20]  I. Bičík,et al.  Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries , 2001 .

[21]  H. Palang.  Landscape changes in Estonia: the past and the future , 1998 .

[22]  R. Rabbinge,et al.  Changes in agriculture and land use in Europe , 2000 .

[23]  D. Gilbertson,et al.  The Cultural Landscape: Past, Present and Future , 1990 .

[24]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The Human Development Index and Sustainability - A Constructive Proposal , 2001 .

[25]  R. Goodland.  The Concept of Environmental Sustainability , 1995 .

[26]  P. Angelstam,et al.  West-east cooperation in Europe for sustainable boreal forests , 1995 .

[27]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity , 2004 .

[28]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Ecosystem Management: Adaptive, Community-Based Conservation , 2002 .

[29]  D. Good.  The Economic Lag of Central and Eastern Europe: Income Estimates for the Habsburg Successor States, 1870–1910 , 1994, The Journal of Economic History.

[30]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources , 1999 .

[31]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management , 2002 .

[32]  John L. Innes,et al.  Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests , 2001 .

[33]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen , 1984 .

[34]  R. Houghton,et al.  Carbon dioxide mitigation in forestry and wood industry. , 1998 .

[35]  Per Angelstam,et al.  Economic Geography, Forest Distribution, and Woodpecker Diversity in Central Europe , 1998 .