Authorship order

Considering the fact that authorship order plays such a significant role as a basis for scientific merit, this paper looks into the practices of authorship order from a research ethical perspective. We conclude that there is a wide variety of practices and no common understanding of what the different authorship positions signify. Authorship guidelines do not provide much help. We recognize that, regardless of what system for valuing authorship positions is used, it will be misleading and unfair in most applications because relative contributions vary in ways that are not captured by fixed value assignments to authorship positions. In theory, assigning percentage figures reflecting the relative contributions of the authors would solve that problem, but we argue that such a scheme is not likely to work in practice. It can also be questioned whether relative, rather than absolute, contributions should be the basis for scientific merit. Contributorship is discussed as an alternative, but is recognized to be insufficient both in communicating absolute and relative contributions, as standardly used. However, there may be a way forward with contributorship, but then, the level of detail needs to increase considerably and its application be standardized.

[1]  D. Rennie,et al.  When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. , 1997, JAMA.

[2]  D. Mccormick.  Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[3]  G. Helgesson,et al.  Misuse of Coauthorship in Medical Theses in Sweden , 2018, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[4]  Hude Quan,et al.  Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment , 2010, BMC medical education.

[5]  Amber Dance,et al.  Authorship: Who's on first? , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Credit where credit's due , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Ana Marušić,et al.  A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Elizabeth Wager,et al.  Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? , 2007, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[9]  Ana Marusic,et al.  Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[10]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[11]  C Stubbs,et al.  The serious business of listing authors , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Marek Kosmulski,et al.  The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Richard Smith,et al.  Authorship is dying: long live contributorship , 1997, BMJ.

[14]  H. Zuckerman.  Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Marjorie M. K. Hlava,et al.  Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[16]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[17]  Mohammad Hosseini,et al.  The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity , 2020, Accountability in research.

[18]  Robert W. Matthews,et al.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[19]  Davide Castelvecchi,et al.  Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors , 2015, Nature.

[20]  Thomas R. Scott,et al.  QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors , 2003, Nature.

[21]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  Self-enhancement and Superiority Biases in Social Comparison , 1993 .

[22]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[23]  Qinghui Zhou,et al.  [Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals]. , 2014, Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology.

[24]  Carolin Haeussler,et al.  Authorship and contribution disclosures , 2017, Science Advances.

[25]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.

[26]  K. Strange.  Authorship: why not just toss a coin? , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[27]  T. Prabhakar Clement,et al.  Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[28]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[29]  Sebastian Frische.  It is time for full disclosure of author contributions , 2012, Nature.