Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change.

The current research tests a model for understanding how benevolent sexism undermines, whereas hostile sexism promotes, social change. Study 1 (N = 99) and Study 2 (N = 92) demonstrate that exposing women to benevolent sexism decreases their engagement in collective action, whereas exposure to hostile sexism increases it. Both effects were mediated by gender-specific system justification and perceived advantages of being a woman. In Study 2, positive and negative affect also mediated these relationships. Results from Studies 3 and 4 (N = 68 and N = 37) support the causal chain described in the mediational models tested in Studies 1 and 2. Manipulations that increased gender-specific system justification (Study 3) and perceived advantages of being a woman (Study 4) reduced intentions to participate in collective action.

[1]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[2]  M. Zanna,et al.  Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  P. Glick,et al.  The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women , 1997 .

[4]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Intergroup Misunderstandings : Impact of Divergent Social Realities , 2013 .

[5]  S. Staggenborg,et al.  Frontiers in Social Movement Theory , 1992 .

[6]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Wanting It Both Ways: Do Women Approve of Benevolent Sexism? , 1998 .

[7]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  The Irony of Harmony , 2009, Psychological science.

[8]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  The Joy of Sexism? A Multinational Investigation of Hostile and Benevolent Justifications for Gender Inequality and Their Relations to Subjective Well-Being , 2010 .

[9]  C. Stangor,et al.  Ask, Answer, and Announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination , 2003 .

[10]  Karl-Heinz Renner,et al.  Self-Monitoring und Authentizität: Die verkannten Selbstdarsteller , 2002 .

[11]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[12]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. , 1996 .

[13]  G. Bohner,et al.  How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory , 2010 .

[14]  M. Schneider-Düker,et al.  Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen: Ergebnisse zur deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role Inventory. , 1988 .

[15]  M. Jackman,et al.  The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations , 1994 .

[16]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[17]  T. Tyler,et al.  Moral Outrage Mediates the Dampening Effect of System Justification on Support for Redistributive Social Policies , 2007, Psychological science.

[18]  S. Fiske,et al.  An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[19]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[20]  T. Eckes,et al.  Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des ambivalenten Sexismus , 1999 .

[21]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[22]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Gender stereotypes : perception or rationalization? , 1990 .

[23]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[24]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[25]  S. Fiske,et al.  Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[27]  Selective self-stereotyping. , 1996 .

[28]  R. Petty,et al.  The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. , 2009 .

[30]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[31]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Jost,et al.  The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology , 2002 .

[33]  P. Glick,et al.  It's for Your Own Good: Benevolent Sexism and Women's Reactions to Protectively Justified Restrictions , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  The glass ceiling in the 21st century: understanding barriers to gender equality , 2009 .

[35]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Stephen C. Wright.  Strategic Collective Action: Social Psychology and Social Change , 2008 .

[37]  N. Feather.  Value Correlates of Ambivalent Attitudes toward Gender Relations , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities , 2005 .

[39]  Melissa J. Ferguson,et al.  Everyday Sexism: Evidence for Its Incidence, Nature, and Psychological Impact From Three Daily Diary Studies , 2001 .

[40]  J. Becker.  Why Do Women Endorse Hostile and Benevolent Sexism? The Role of Salient Female Subtypes and Internalization of Sexist Contents , 2010 .

[41]  Antonio Gramsci.  Selections from the prison notebooks , 2020, The Applied Theatre Reader.

[42]  M. Dumont,et al.  Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women's performance. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .

[44]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Changing Racial Beliefs by Providing Consensus Information , 2001 .

[45]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression , 1999 .

[46]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  K. Marx,et al.  Manifest der Kommunistischen partei , 1945 .

[48]  William A. Gamson,et al.  The social psychology of collective action. , 1992 .

[49]  S. J. Kraus,et al.  Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 1990 .

[50]  R. Lennox,et al.  Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. , 1986 .

[51]  Chris G Sibley,et al.  Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[52]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Judgments of Sexism: A Comparison of the Subtlety of Sexism Measures and Sources of Variability in Judgments of Sexism1 , 2005 .

[53]  Stephen C. Wright.  Collective Action and Social Change , 2010 .