Organizational rewards: considering employee need in allocation

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate how employee need relates to rewards and employee perceptions of fairness within an organization in the USA using a pay-for-performance system. Design/methodology/approach – To evaluate the presence of a relationship between employee need and reward allocation in a pay-for-performance system, a questionnaire was administered to a sample of 292 employees from two departments at an academic medical center. Findings – The findings highlight the positive relationship between employee need and reward allocation that remains when controlling for employee performance evaluation ratings. Findings further show that employee communication with the manager about need explains this relationship. Research limitations/implications – The findings make two important contributions to research on reward allocation and performance management. First, the results show employee need is related to the allocation of rewards in organizational settings outside of collectivistic...

[1]  J. Giacobbe-Miller,et al.  A COMPARISON OF RUSSIAN AND U.S. PAY ALLOCATION DECISIONS, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE JUDGMENTS, AND PRODUCTIVITY UNDER DIFFERENT PAYMENT CONDITIONS , 1998 .

[2]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community , 1998 .

[3]  Paul W. Thurston,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of Missing Item Methods , 2000 .

[4]  V. Murphy-Berman,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Perceptions of Distributive Justice , 2002 .

[5]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference , 1993 .

[7]  J. Kelley,et al.  Justifications of Inequality: The Normative Basis of Pay Differentials in 31 Nations* , 2010 .

[8]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[9]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Equity, Equality, or Need? The Effects of Organizational Culture on the Allocation of Benefits and Burdens , 1995 .

[10]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Brett T. Litz,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Life Events Checklist , 2004, Assessment.

[12]  A. Richards,et al.  Individualism, collectivism and reward allocation: A cross-cultural study in Russia and Britain , 1997 .

[13]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  S. Anderson,et al.  Formal Organizational Initiatives and Informal Workplace Practices: Links to Work-Family Conflict and Job-Related Outcomes , 2002 .

[15]  J. Giacobbe-Miller,et al.  Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations , 1997 .

[16]  Bi-Fen Hsu,et al.  The relationship between supervisory support and work-family conflict: The guanxi, LMX, and emotional intelligence perspectives , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[17]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[19]  Li Wang,et al.  An investigation on the attitudes of Chinese workers towards individually based performance-related reward systems , 2007 .

[20]  Debra A. Major,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF NEWCOMER EXPECTATIONS, EARLY SOCIALIZATION OUTCOMES, AND THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ROLE DEVELOPMENT FACTORS , 1995 .

[21]  W Zhang,et al.  Country and organizational-level adaptation to foreign workplace ideologies: a comparative study of distributive justice values in China, Russia and the United States , 2003 .

[22]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[23]  Joo-yup Kim,et al.  NATIONAL CULTURE AND THE FACTORS AFFECTING PERCEPTIONS OF PAY FAIRNESS IN KOREA AND THE UNITED STATES , 1997 .

[24]  D. McFarlin,et al.  Cross-cultural applications of organizational justice , 2001 .

[25]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[26]  Michael R. Reich,et al.  Micro-Macro Linkages in High-Performance Employment Systems , 1997 .

[27]  Timothy D. Golden,et al.  The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction , 2006 .

[28]  John S. Lawler,et al.  Performance-based pay, procedural justice and job performance for R&D professionals: evidence from the Taiwanese high-tech sector , 2010 .

[29]  Janet Taylor Spence,et al.  Contemporary topics in social psychology , 1976 .

[30]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[31]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[32]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Understanding pay plan acceptance: The role of distributive justice theory , 2002 .

[33]  Suzanne Zivnuska,et al.  The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  M. Bond,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation , 1984 .

[35]  R. Fischer,et al.  Organizational reward allocation: a comparison of British and German organizations , 2004 .

[36]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Whence Differences in Value Priorities? , 2011 .

[37]  T. Scandura,et al.  Trust and Leader—Member Exchange , 2008 .

[38]  Steven D. Papamarcos,et al.  Hofstede's I-C Dimension as Predictive of Allocative Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[39]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural influences on personality. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[40]  Kimberly M. Lukaszewski,et al.  The impact of cultural values on the acceptance and effectiveness of human resource management policies and practices , 2007 .

[41]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[42]  Peter B. Smith,et al.  How Do Organizations Allocate Rewards? The Predictive Validity of National Values, Economic and Organizational Factors Across Six Nations , 2007 .

[43]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Hun-Joon Park,et al.  REWARD ALLOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, JAPAN, AND KOREA: A COMPARISON OF INDIVIDUALISTIC AND COLLECTIVISTIC CULTURES , 1990 .

[45]  George B. Graen,et al.  When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence. , 1986 .

[46]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[47]  Maureen L. Mackenzie.  Manager communication and workplace trust: Understanding manager and employee perceptions in the e-world , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[48]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  CHINESE AND AMERICAN MANAGERS' COMPENSATION AWARD DECISIONS: A COMPARATIVE POLICY‐CAPTURING STUDY , 2001 .

[49]  D. Matsumoto,et al.  Changing Patterns of Individualism and Collectivism in the United States and Japan , 1996 .

[50]  Juhee Hahn,et al.  Does pay‐for‐performance enhance perceived distributive justice for collectivistic employees? , 2006 .

[51]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[52]  Benjamin F. Rodriguez,et al.  Psychometric Properties , 2009 .

[53]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study , 2002 .

[54]  Zhi-xue Zhang,et al.  Beyond Distributive Justice: The Reasonableness Norm in Chinese Reward Allocation , 1998 .

[55]  C. Stilwell,et al.  Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions , 2004 .

[56]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[57]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation , 2000 .

[58]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[59]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[60]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[61]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[62]  Sandra J. Hartman,et al.  An investigation of relationships between communication style and leader‐member exchange , 2002 .

[63]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Cross-cultural organizational behavior. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  S. Gully,et al.  Collectivism and goal orientation as mediators of the effect of national identity on merit pay decisions , 2003 .

[66]  K. Rasinski,et al.  What's fair is fair--or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Chao-chuan Chen,et al.  New Trends in Rewards Allocation Preferences: A Sino-U.S. Comparison , 1995 .

[68]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[69]  D. De Cremer,et al.  Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay , 2009 .

[70]  Harry C. Hui,et al.  Deciding on equity or parity: a test of situational, cultural, and individual factors , 1998 .

[71]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[72]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Individual and group reward allocation decisions in two situational contexts: Effects of relative need and performance. , 1985 .

[73]  T. Tyler,et al.  Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. , 1986 .

[74]  F. Chiang,et al.  A taxonomy of reward preference: Examining country differences , 2005 .

[75]  The Justice of Equity, Equality, and Need in Reward Distributions: A Comparison of French and American Respondents , 2006 .

[76]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Justice for all? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice , 2000 .

[77]  Rosalie J. Hall,et al.  Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary Constructs , 1999 .

[78]  Ronald Fischer,et al.  Reward Allocation and Culture , 2003 .

[79]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[80]  M. Bond,et al.  How Does Cultural Collectivism Operate? , 1982 .

[81]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .