Currently, design of earth-penetrating munitions relies heavily on empirical relationships to estimate behavior, making it difficult to design novel munitions or address novel target situations without expensive and time-consuming full-scale testing with relevant system and target characteristics. Enhancing design through numerical studies and modeling could help reduce the extent and duration of full-scale testing if the models have enough fidelity to capture all of the relevant parameters. This can be separated into three distinct problems: that of the penetrator structural and component response, that of the target response, and that of the coupling between the two. This project focuses on enhancing understanding of the target response, specifically granular geomaterials, where the temporal and spatial multi-scale nature of the material controls its response. As part of the overarching goal of developing computational capabilities to predict the performance of conventional earth-penetrating weapons, this project focuses specifically on developing new models and numerical capabilities for modeling sand response in ALE3D. There is general recognition that granular materials behave in a manner that defies conventional continuum approaches which rely on response locality and which degrade in the presence of strong response nonlinearities, localization, and phase gradients. There are many numerical tools available to address parts of the problem. However, to enhance modeling capability, this project is pursuing a bottom-up approach of building constitutive models from higher fidelity, smaller spatial scale simulations (rather than from macro-scale observations of physical behavior as is traditionally employed) that are being augmented to address the unique challenges of mesoscale modeling of dynamically loaded granular materials. Through understanding response and sensitivity at the grain-scale, it is expected that better reduced order representations of response can be formulated at the continuum scale as illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The final result of this project is to implement such reduced order models in the ALE3D material library for general use.
[1]
B. Song,et al.
SAND 2010-2289 Unlimited Release Printed April 2010 Compressive Behavior of Fine Sand Prepared
,
2010
.
[2]
Tongxi Yu,et al.
Fragmentation of brittle spheres under static and dynamic compressions: experiments and analyses
,
2000
.
[3]
D. Grady,et al.
DYNAMIC COMPACTION OF SAND
,
2007
.
[4]
Joseph P. Morris,et al.
Simulations of Fracture and Fragmentation of Geologic Materials using Combined FEM/DEM Analysis
,
2005
.
[5]
E. B. Mayfield,et al.
Dynamics of a Projectile Penetrating Sand. Part II
,
1957
.
[6]
Werner Goldsmith,et al.
The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets
,
1978
.
[7]
T. Wichtmann,et al.
Influence of the Grain-Size Distribution Curve of Quartz Sand on the Small Strain Shear Modulus Gmax
,
2009
.
[8]
K. Høeg,et al.
Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing—experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality
,
2002
.
[9]
F. Chester,et al.
Subcritical compaction and yielding of granular quartz sand
,
2003
.
[10]
Nduka Nnamdi (Ndy) Ekere,et al.
Computer simulation of random packing of unequal particles.
,
1999,
Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.
[11]
W. Cooper,et al.
Grain fracture in rapid particulate media deformation and a particulate media research roadmap from the PMEE workshops
,
2010
.
[12]
R. Graham.
Shock-wave compression of x-cut quartz as determined by electrical response measurements
,
1974
.
[13]
E. B. Mayfield,et al.
Dynamics of a Projectile Penetrating Sand
,
1957
.
[14]
J. J. Gallagher.
Fracturing of Quartz Sand Grains
,
1976
.
[15]
L. Chhabildas,et al.
Shock response of dry sand.
,
2007
.