Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related FMRI with multiple trial types Part I: theory

Experimental designs for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments can be characterized by their estimation efficiency, which is a measure of the variance in the estimate of the hemodynamic response function (HRF), and their detection power, which is a measure of the variance in the estimate of the amplitude of functional activity. Previous studies have shown that there exists a fundamental trade-off between efficiency and power for experiments with a single trial type of interest. This paper extends the prior work by presenting a theoretical model for the relation between detection power and estimation efficiency in experiments with multiple trial types. It is shown that the trade-off between efficiency and power present in multiple-trial-type experiments is identical in form to that observed for single-trial-type experiments. Departures from the predicted trade-off due to the inclusion of basis function expansions and the assumption of correlated noise are examined. Finally, conditional entropy is introduced as measure for the randomness of a design, and an empirical relation between entropy and estimation efficiency is presented.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[3]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Efficient Design of Event-Related fMRI Experiments Using M-Sequences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Part II: design of experiments , 2022 .

[5]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Matched subspace detectors , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  T. Moon,et al.  Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing , 1999 .

[7]  R. Buxton,et al.  Sorting out event-related paradigms in fMRI: the distinction between detecting an activation and estimating the hemodynamic response , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  Gregory S. Berns,et al.  The Context of Uncertainty Modulates the Subcortical Response to Predictability , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  A M Dale,et al.  Estimation and detection of event‐related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: A statistically efficient and unbiased approach , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[12]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[13]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  R. Buxton,et al.  Detection Power, Estimation Efficiency, and Predictability in Event-Related fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[17]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI study of face perception and memory using random stimulus sequences. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Moorehead All rights reserved , 1997 .

[21]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Joe Brewer,et al.  Kronecker products and matrix calculus in system theory , 1978 .

[23]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[25]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Perturbation signals for system identification , 1993 .

[26]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Detection versus Estimation in Event-Related fMRI: Choosing the Optimal Stimulus Timing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .