Affect control theory: An assessment*

This paper reviews affect control theory's major strengths, the contributions of recent work to its growth, and the most promising avenues for future work. Affect control theory's strengths include (1) the precision of its mathematical statement and empirical base (especially when compared with earlier interpretive sociologies), (2) its ability to link the internal processing that generates social action to the socio‐cultural system upon which that action is based, and (3) the generality that allows a parsimonious explanation of a wide range of processes and previous research findings. Recent advances provide (1) new, more accurate impression‐change formulas, (2) the expansion of the theory to encompass settings, emotions, and traits, (3) new dictionaries of evaluation, potency and acitivity meanings and (4) tests of the theory using likelihood judgments, verbal scenarios and actual behavior of naive experimental subjects. Further work must include links to cognitive structures that will further delineate...

[1]  H. F. Gollob,et al.  Judgments of an actor's Power and ability to influence others , 1973 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Carley.  An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure , 1986 .

[3]  H. F. Gollob.  Impression formation and word combination in sentences. , 1968 .

[4]  D. R. Heise.  Potency dynamics in simple sentences. , 1970 .

[5]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  Impressions of Goodness, Powerfulness, and Liveliness from Discerned Social Events , 1981 .

[6]  Diane H Felmlee.  A model of classical organizational structure: A look at administrative intensity* , 1986 .

[7]  W. T. Powers.  Behavior, the control of perception , 1973 .

[8]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Role-Programme Models and the Analysis of Institutional Structure , 1980 .

[9]  R. Collins.  On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  L. Smith-Lovin.  THE AFFECTIVE CONTROL OF EVENTS WITHIN SETTINGS , 1987 .

[11]  David R. Heise.  Affect control theory: Concepts and model , 1987 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon , 1986 .

[13]  W. T. Powers.  Quantitative Analysis of Purposive Systems: Some Spadework at the Foundations of Scientific Psychology , 1978 .

[14]  W T Powers,et al.  Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism , 1973, Science.

[15]  D. R. Heise.  Affectual dynamics in simple sentences. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[17]  J. Skvoretz,et al.  Roles and role-programs , 1980 .

[18]  David R. Heise,et al.  Social action as the control of affect , 1977 .

[19]  H. F. Gollob.  The subject-verb-object approach to social cognition. , 1974 .

[20]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  Impressions from events , 1987 .

[21]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Institutions as production systems , 1984 .

[22]  D. R. Heise.  Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action , 1981 .

[23]  F. Heider.  On social cognition. , 1967, The American psychologist.

[24]  L. Smith-Lovin.  Behavior Settings and Impressions Formed from Social Scenarios , 1979 .

[25]  David R. Heise,et al.  Affect control theory: Respecification, estimation, and tests of the formal model , 1985 .