Chapter 2 Persuasion: Insights from the Self‐Validation Hypothesis

[1]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Doubting one's doubt: A formula for confidence? , 2010 .

[2]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Body posture effects on self‐evaluation: A self‐validation approach , 2009 .

[3]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Discovering That the Shoe Fits , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  5. Implicit ambivalence: a meta-cognitive approach , 2009 .

[5]  F. Strack,et al.  4 Attitudes and Cognitive Consistency * The Role of Associative and Propositional Processes , 2022 .

[6]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence and Message-Based Persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty , 2008 .

[8]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2008 .

[9]  R. Petty,et al.  Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[10]  R. Petty,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Persuasion , 2008 .

[11]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of Mortality Salience in Consumer Persuasion , 2008 .

[12]  R. Petty,et al.  Embodied persuasion: fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes , 2008 .

[13]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The Source-Context-Elaboration Model. , 2008 .

[14]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength , 2007 .

[16]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  Self and Attitude Strength Parallels: Focus on Accessibility , 2007 .

[18]  G. Clore,et al.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  The Effect of Self-Affirmation in Nonthreatening Persuasion Domains: Timing Affects the Process , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[20]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  MULTIPLE ROLES FOR SOURCE CREDIBILITY UNDER HIGH ELABORATION: IT'S ALL IN THE TIMING , 2007 .

[21]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: the role of unrequested cognitions. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  11. The role of metacognition in social judgment , 2007 .

[23]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The role of meta-cognitive processes in emotional intelligence. , 2006, Psicothema.

[24]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Should I follow my feelings? How individual differences in following feelings influence affective well-being, experience, and responsiveness , 2006 .

[25]  L. Vaughn,et al.  Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  R. Petty,et al.  When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .

[27]  R. Petty,et al.  Fundamental processes leading to attitude change : Implications for cancer prevention communications , 2006 .

[28]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  John G. Lynch.  Accessibility-Diagnosticity and the Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment Model , 2006 .

[30]  R. Petty,et al.  The Malleable Meaning of Subjective Ease , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Petty,et al.  Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Not all stereotyping is created equal: differential consequences of thoughtful versus non-thoughtful stereotyping. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  R. Petty,et al.  Understanding Social Judgment: Multiple Systems And Processes , 2006 .

[34]  M. Zanna,et al.  An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. , 2004 .

[35]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Self‐Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements , 2004 .

[36]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Michel Tuan Pham.  The Logic of Feeling , 2004 .

[38]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  S. Segerstrom,et al.  A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what's on your mind, and how, and how much? , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[42]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. , 2003 .

[43]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis , 2002 .

[44]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  R. Petty,et al.  Mass Media Attitude Change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 2002 .

[46]  M. Zanna,et al.  Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[48]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self , 2000 .

[51]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[52]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Affect as information , 2013 .

[53]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know , 2000 .

[54]  Kathryn C. Oleson,et al.  Subjective overachievement: individual differences in self-doubt and concern with performance. , 2000, Journal of personality.

[55]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Leonard L. Martin.  Moods do not convey information: Moods in context do. , 2000 .

[57]  Jason Hart,et al.  Are the Tabloids Always Wrong or Is That Just What We Think? Need for Cognition and Perceptions of Articles in Print Media , 1999 .

[58]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[59]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[60]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  HELP, I NEED SOMEBODY: AUTOMATIC ACTION AND INACTION , 1998 .

[61]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments , 1998 .

[62]  W. Crano,et al.  The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. , 1998 .

[63]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[64]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[65]  Jill A. Jacobson,et al.  Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. , 1997 .

[66]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements , 1997 .

[67]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[68]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[69]  R. Petty,et al.  The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy , 1996 .

[71]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[72]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: the hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  R. Petty,et al.  Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior , 1995 .

[74]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[75]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[76]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Majority and minority influence : source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny , 1994 .

[77]  W. Wood,et al.  Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[80]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[81]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[82]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[83]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications , 1991 .

[84]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[85]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[86]  Ruben Orive,et al.  Group Consensus, Action Immediacy, and Opinion Confidence , 1988 .

[87]  R. Orive.  Social projection and social comparison of opinions. , 1988 .

[88]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[89]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[90]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[91]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .

[92]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory , 1986 .

[93]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[94]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[95]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments , 1980 .

[96]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[97]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[98]  A. Beck,et al.  Brief Cognitive Therapies , 1979 .

[99]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[100]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[101]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[102]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. , 1973 .

[103]  K. Kaplan.  On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[104]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[105]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[106]  A. Greenwald.  6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[107]  C. Staats,et al.  Attitudes established by classical conditioning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[108]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[109]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.