Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect.

This research demonstrated that accountability can not only reduce judgmental bias, but also exacerbate it--in this case, the dilution effect. Ss made predictions from either diagnostic information alone or diagnostic information plus mixtures of additional data (nondiagnostic information, additional diagnostic data pointing to either the same conclusion or the opposite conclusion). Relative to unaccountable Ss, accountable Ss (a) diluted their predictions in response to nondiagnostic information and (b) were more responsive to additional diagnostic information. The accountability manipulation motivated subjects to use a wide range of information in making judgments, but did not make them more discriminating judges of the usefulness of that information.

[1]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication and social cognition. , 1984 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[3]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[4]  J. I. Kim,et al.  Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  P. Rabbit.  Human information processing , 1977, Nature.

[6]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Identifying Victims of Groupthink From Public Statements of Decision Makers , 1979 .

[7]  P. H. Lindsay.  Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[8]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[9]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[10]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[11]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. , 1983 .

[12]  J. Jenkins.  Can we have a fruitful cognitive psychology? , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[13]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[14]  Henry Zukier.  The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and the dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. , 1982 .

[15]  Carolin J. Showers,et al.  Social Cognition: A Look at Motivated Strategies , 1985 .

[16]  M. Manis.  Cognitive Social Psychology , 1977 .

[17]  P. Kline.  Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[19]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[20]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. , 1984 .

[21]  S. Fiske,et al.  Outcome Dependency and Attention to Inconsistent Information , 1984 .

[22]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[23]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[24]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[25]  S. Streufert,et al.  Behavior in the complex environment. , 1978 .

[26]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[27]  E. E. Jones.  The rocky road from acts to dispositions. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[28]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Pre- to postelection shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment. , 1981 .

[29]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[30]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  James Shanteau,et al.  Inferences based on nondiagnostic information , 1977 .

[32]  R. Abelson.  Decision making and decision theory , 1985 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[34]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[35]  Ralph K. White,et al.  Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war , 1986 .

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[37]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[38]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. , 1984 .