First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner

Time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) was studied and preliminarily developed in the 1980s, but the lack of a scintillator able to deliver at the same time proper time resolution and stopping power has prevented this technique from becoming widespread and commercially available. With the introduction of LSO in PET, TOF is now a feasible option. TOF reconstruction has been implemented in the CPS Hi-Rez PET scanner, both with 2D filtered-back-projection (FBP2D) and 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM3D). A new procedure has been introduced in the time alignment to compensate for the limited digital time resolution of the present electronics. A preliminary version of scatter correction for TOF has been devised and is presented. The measured time resolution of 1.2 ns (FWHM) allowed for a signal-to-noise ratio increase of about 50% in phantoms of about 40 cm transaxial size, or a gain larger than 2 in noise equivalent counts (NEC). TOF reconstruction has shown the expected improvement in SNR, both in simulation and experimental data. First experimental results show two improvements of TOF reconstruction over conventional (non-TOF) reconstruction: a lower noise level and a better capability to resolve structures deep inside large objects.

[1]  T. Tomitani.  Image Reconstruction and Noise Evaluation in Photon Time-of-Flight Assisted Positron Emission Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Physical characteristics of TTV03, a new high spatial resolution time-of-flight positron tomograph , 1990 .

[3]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Image Reconstruction Algorithms in PET , 2005 .

[4]  P. Grangeat,et al.  Three-dimensional PET reconstruction with time-of-flight measurement. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Victor J. Sank,et al.  POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES OF A CESIUM FLUORIDE SCINTILLATOR FOR A TIME‐OF‐FLIGHT POSITRON CAMERA , 1980, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  David G. Politte.  Image improvements in positron-emission tomography due to measuring differential time-of-flight and using maximum-likelihood estimation , 1990 .

[7]  W. Moses,et al.  Prospects for time-of-flight PET using LSO scintillator , 1999 .

[8]  C. Melcher,et al.  Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[9]  D. Snyder,et al.  Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[10]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Mikio Yamamoto,et al.  Time-of-flight positron imaging and the resolution improvement by an iterative method , 1989 .

[12]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Performance measurements of the SP3000/UW time-of-flight positron emission tomograph , 1988 .

[13]  T. Gremillion,et al.  LSO PET/CT Pico performance improvements with ultra Hi-Rez option , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[14]  W. Moses.  Time of flight in PET revisited , 2003 .

[15]  M. Ter-pogossian,et al.  Feasibility of time-of-flight reconstruction in positron emission tomography. , 1980, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Ziad Burbar,et al.  Coincidence time alignment of high resolution planar detectors , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[17]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Image Reconstruction from List-Mode Data in an Emission Tomography System Having Time-of-Flight Measurements , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  M. Defrise,et al.  Fourier rebinning of time-of-flight PET data , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[20]  T. Budinger.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Time-of-flight PET. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[22]  T. Hebert,et al.  Fast methods for including attenuation in the EM algorithm , 1990 .

[23]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  A Matheematical Model for Positron-Emission Tomography Systems Having Time-of-Flight Measurements , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[24]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Investigation of lanthanum scintillators for 3-D PET , 2002 .

[25]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[26]  R. Allemand,et al.  Barium fluoride — Inorganic scintillator for subnanosecond timing , 1983 .

[27]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.