E-mail in government: Not post-bureaucratic but late-bureaucratic organizations

Empirical research provides evidence that electronic communication does not change government agencies into post-bureaucratic organizations. Structuration Theory is used to explore the interaction between e-mail use, communication patterns of civil servants, and two bureaucratic characteristics: formalization and hierarchy. Previous research suggested that the use of e-mail leads to less formalization and less hierarchy, but empirical research in three bureaucratic organizations in the Netherlands leads to different conclusions. First, the use of e-mail leads to informal formalization: the style of communication is more informal but the content focuses less on personal issues and emphasizes efficient recordings of agreements. Second, the use of e-mail leads to hierarchical horizontalization: horizontal contacts take a more central position in bureaucratic organizations but these horizontal contacts are tightly linked to vertical structures. The result of the interaction between e-mail and government bureaucracy is horizontal communication directly linked to vertical structures. Electronic communication turns government agencies into late-bureaucratic organizations.

[1]  Denise E. Murray,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication: Implications for ESP. , 1988 .

[2]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[3]  B. J. van den Hooff,et al.  Incorporating electronic mail: Adoption, use and effects of electronic mail in organizations , 1997 .

[4]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Communication across Boundaries: Work, Structure, and Use of Communication Technologies in a Large Organization , 1995 .

[5]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Accountability , 2001 .

[6]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[7]  F. Scharpf.  Games Real Actors Could Play , 1994 .

[8]  M. Weber.  Economy and society : an outline of interpretive sociology , 2008 .

[9]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Hierarchy in Organizations. , 1975 .

[10]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 2003 .

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[12]  Bill Harley,et al.  The Myth of Empowerment: Work Organisation, Hierarchy and Employee Autonomy in Contemporary Australian Workplaces , 1999 .

[13]  Wolfgang C. Müller,et al.  Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies , 2003 .

[14]  Mark Bovens,et al.  The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations , 1998 .

[15]  Elaine M. Landry.  Scrolling Around the New Organization: The Potential for Conflict in the On-Line Environment , 2000 .

[16]  N. Schofield,et al.  The analysis of relations in an organisation , 1983 .

[17]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[18]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[19]  Ronald J. Deibert.  Parchment, printing, and hypermedia : communication in world order transformation , 1997 .

[20]  Harold L. Wilensky.  Organizational Intelligence: Knowledge and Policy in Government and Industry , 1967 .

[21]  W. Richard Scott.  Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[22]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Groupware, social action and organizational emergence: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work , 1998 .

[23]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[25]  Ned Kock,et al.  Team adaptation to electronic communication media: evidence of compensatory adaptation in new product development teams , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  James R. Taylor,et al.  The computerization of work : a communication perspective , 2001 .

[27]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[28]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[29]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[30]  Glenn Hoetker,et al.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional ChangeBuilding the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change, by FountainJane E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. , 2002 .

[31]  Thomas W. Jackson,et al.  Email training significantly reduces email defects , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[32]  W. T. Eijsbouts.  The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organizations (M. Bovens; Cambridge 1998). Zeit und Recht,(G. Winkler; Wenen 1995) [Review of: @ @ (1998) -] , 1998 .

[33]  Arnold S. Tannenbaum,et al.  Hierarchy in Organizations. , 1976 .

[34]  R. R. Ball.  The effects of electronic mail on organisational structure , 1991 .

[35]  A. Donnellon,et al.  The Post-bureaucratic organization : new perspectives on organizational change , 1994 .

[36]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[37]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[38]  A. Giddens,et al.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , 1994 .

[39]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[40]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet , 2001 .

[41]  Saadi Lahlou,et al.  The impact of a threatening e‐mail reprimand on the recipient's blood pressure , 2005 .

[42]  V. Vroom,et al.  Industrial Social Psychology , 1961 .

[43]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[44]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Review: Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2003 .

[45]  Denise E. Murray.  Computer-mediated communication: Implications for ESP1 , 1988 .

[46]  Lorna Heaton,et al.  The Computerization of Work: A Communication Perspective , 2000 .

[47]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Affordances and the Analysis of Technologically Mediated Interaction: , 2003 .

[48]  Cathleen Stasz,et al.  Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency , 1986, CSCW '86.

[49]  Sheri Berman.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[50]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .