Improving the Capacity of Molecular Communication Using Enzymatic Reaction Cycles

This paper considers the capacity of a diffusion-based molecular communication link assuming the receiver uses chemical reactions. The key contribution is we show that enzymatic reaction cycles, which is a class of chemical reactions commonly found in cells consisting of a forward and a backward enzymatic reaction, can improve the capacity of the communication link. The technical difficulty in analyzing enzymatic reaction cycles is that their reaction rates are nonlinear. We deal with this by assuming that the amount of certain chemicals in the enzymatic reaction cycle is large. In order to simplify the problem further, we use singular perturbation to study a particular operating regime of the enzymatic reaction cycles. This allows us to derive a closed-form expression of the channel gain. This expression suggests that we can improve the channel gain by increasing the total amount of substrate in the enzymatic reaction cycle. By using numerical calculations, we show that the effect of the enzymatic reaction cycle is to increase the channel gain and to reduce the noise, which results in a better signal-to-noise ratio and in turn a higher communication capacity. Furthermore, we show that we can increase the capacity by increasing the total amount of substrate in the enzymatic reaction cycle.

[1]  Gillespie,et al.  Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and its integral. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Modulation Techniques for Communication via Diffusion in Nanonetworks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[3]  P. Maini,et al.  A practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes , 2007, 0704.1908.

[4]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Impact of Receiver Molecular Circuits on the Performance of Reaction Shift Keying , 2015, NANOCOM.

[5]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication and Networking: Opportunities and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[6]  Uche A. K. Chude-Okonkwo,et al.  Diffusion-controlled enzyme-catalyzed molecular communication system for targeted drug delivery , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[7]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Generalized Solution for the Demodulation of Reaction Shift Keying Signals in Molecular Communication Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[8]  Filipe Tostevin,et al.  Mutual information in time-varying biochemical systems. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Maximum A-Posteriori Decoding for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Using Analog Filters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[10]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  The internet of Bio-Nano things , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  On the characteristics of concentration-encoded multi-level amplitude modulated unicast molecular communication , 2011, 2011 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering(CCECE).

[12]  Satoshi Hiyama,et al.  Molecular communication: Harnessing biochemical materials to engineer biomimetic communication systems , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[13]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  A control theoretic framework for modular analysis and design of biomolecular networks , 2013, Annu. Rev. Control..

[14]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[15]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Noise Analysis in Ligand-Binding Reception for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Robert Schober,et al.  Optimal Receiver Design for Diffusive Molecular Communication With Flow and Additive Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[17]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Sebastian Magierowski,et al.  Optimum receiver for molecule shift keying modulation in diffusion-based molecular communication channels , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[19]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A physical end-to-end model for molecular communication in nanonetworks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Deepak Mishra,et al.  A load driver device for engineering modularity in biological networks , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Robert Schober,et al.  Improving Receiver Performance of Diffusive Molecular Communication With Enzymes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[22]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Impact of Receiver Reaction Mechanisms on the Performance of Molecular Communication Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[23]  Yae Jee Cho,et al.  Interference reduction via enzyme deployment for molecular communication , 2016 .

[24]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication Among Biological Nanomachines: A Layered Architecture and Research Issues , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[25]  A. Arkin,et al.  Contextualizing context for synthetic biology – identifying causes of failure of synthetic biological systems , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[26]  A. Kremling,et al.  Modular analysis of signal transduction networks , 2004, IEEE Control Systems.

[27]  U. Alon An introduction to systems biology : design principles of biological circuits , 2019 .

[28]  Phillip M. Rivera,et al.  Synthetic tunable amplifying buffer circuit in E. coli. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[29]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Demodulation of reaction shift keying signals in molecular communication network with protein kinase receiver circuit , 2016, 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[30]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Modeling and Simulating Chemical Reactions , 2008, SIAM Rev..

[31]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  On Receiver Design for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Diffusion-Based Noise Analysis for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[33]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Deterministic capacity of information flow in molecular nanonetworks , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[34]  F. Tostevin,et al.  Feed-forward loops and diamond motifs lead to tunable transmission of information in the frequency domain. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[36]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  A Markovian Approach to the Optimal Demodulation of Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[37]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Extended Master Equation Models for Molecular Communication Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[38]  Mohsen Sardari,et al.  Capacity of discrete molecular diffusion channels , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[39]  C. Gardiner Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences , 2009 .

[40]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Exact results for noise power spectra in linear biochemical reaction networks. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[41]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Molecular circuits for decoding frequency coded signals in nano-communication networks , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[42]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  On the characterization of binary concentration-encoded molecular communication in nanonetworks , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[43]  Nariman Farsad,et al.  A simple mathematical model for information rate of active transport molecular communication , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[44]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Receivers for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication: Exploiting Memory and Sampling Rate , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[45]  Chun Tung Chou Noise properties of linear molecular communication networks , 2013, Nano Commun. Networks.

[46]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Strength-based optimum signal detection in concentration-encoded pulse-transmitted OOK molecular communication with stochastic ligand-receptor binding , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[47]  J. Casado-Pascual,et al.  Nonlinear Systems, Vol. 2 , 2018 .

[48]  Massimiliano Pierobon A Molecular Communication System Model Based on Biological Circuits , 2014, NANOCOM' 14.

[49]  Chan-Byoung Chae,et al.  Effective Enzyme Deployment for Degradation of Interference Molecules in Molecular Communication , 2017, 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[50]  Maryam Farahnak-Ghazani,et al.  On the Capacity of Point-to-Point and Multiple-Access Molecular Communications With Ligand-Receptors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[51]  Hamdan Awan,et al.  Reducing the Effect of Reaction Rate Constants on the Performance of Molecular Communication Networks , 2016, NANOCOM.

[52]  Mohsen Sardari,et al.  Capacity of diffusion-based molecular communication with ligand receptors , 2011, 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop.

[53]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Receiver Design for Molecular Communication , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[54]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Capacity of a Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication System With Channel Memory and Molecular Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[55]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[56]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  Capacity of a simple intercellular signal transduction channel , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[57]  R. Gallager Information Theory and Reliable Communication , 1968 .

[58]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Molecular communication networks with general molecular circuit receivers , 2013, NANOCOM' 14.

[59]  Ahmad Beirami,et al.  Diffusion channel with Poisson reception process: capacity results and applications , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).