Does laryngeal reinnervation or type I thyroplasty give better voice results for patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (VOCALIST): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Introduction A functioning voice is essential for normal human communication. A good voice requires two moving vocal folds; if one fold is paralysed (unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP)) people suffer from a breathy, weak voice that tires easily and is unable to function normally. UVFP can also result in choking and breathlessness. Current treatment for adults with UVFP is speech therapy to stimulate recovery of vocal fold (VF) motion or function and/or injection of the paralysed VF with a material to move it into a more favourable position for the functioning VF to close against. When these therapies are unsuccessful, or only provide temporary relief, surgery is offered. Two available surgical techniques are: (1) surgical medialisation; placing an implant near the paralysed VF to move it to the middle (thyroplasty) and/or repositioning the cartilage (arytenoid adduction) or (2) restoring the nerve supply to the VF (laryngeal reinnervation). Currently there is limited evidence to determine which surgery should be offered to adults with UVFP. Methods and analysis A feasibility study to test the practicality of running a multicentre, randomised clinical trial of surgery for UVFP, including: (1) a qualitative study to understand the recruitment process and how it operates in clinical centres and (2) a small randomised trial of 30 participants recruited at 3 UK sites comparing non-selective laryngeal reinnervation to type I thyroplasty. Participants will be followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome focuses on recruitment and retention, with secondary outcomes covering voice, swallowing and quality of life. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was received from National Research Ethics Service—Committee Bromley (reference 11/LO/0583). In addition to dissemination of results through presentation and publication of peer-reviewed articles, results will be shared with key clinician and patient groups required to develop the future large-scale randomised controlled trial. Trial registration number ISRCTN90201732; 16 December 2015.

[1]  J. Donovan,et al.  Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) , 2016, Trials.

[2]  Yijin Wu,et al.  The Handbook of Conversation Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  M. Birchall,et al.  Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. , 2015, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[4]  M A Birchall,et al.  Reliability of OperaVOX against Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP) , 2015, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[5]  A. Merati,et al.  Evidence-based practice: evaluation and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[6]  D. Kallogjeri,et al.  Medialization versus reinnervation for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: A multicenter randomized clinical trial , 2011, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  Meng Li,et al.  Laryngeal Reinnervation Using Ansa Cervicalis for Thyroid Surgery-Related Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Long-Term Outcome Analysis of 237 Cases , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Edward D McCoul,et al.  Systematic review of laryngeal reinnervation techniques , 2010, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  P. Belafsky,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[10]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Quality of Life Measures and Predictors for Adults With Unilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  Virgilijus Uloza,et al.  Multidimensional assessment of functional outcomes of medialization thyroplasty , 2005, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[12]  Thomas Murry,et al.  Development and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index‐10 , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Robert T Sataloff,et al.  Thyroplasty revisions: frequency and predictive factors. , 2003, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[14]  L. Robinson,et al.  Electromyographic Findings in Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Reinnervation , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[15]  P. Dejonckere,et al.  A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[16]  R. Casiano,et al.  Thyroplasty type I: short- versus long-term results. , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  L. Ramig,et al.  Intensive voice treatment in Parkinson disease: laryngostroboscopic findings. , 1995, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[18]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Thyroplasty: A New Approach , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[19]  R. Crumley Teflon versus Thyroplasty versus Nerve Transfer: A Comparison , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[20]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnographic Research and the Problem of Data Reduction1 , 1981 .

[21]  Yeun-Chung Chang,et al.  Evaluating Swallowing Dysfunction Using a 100-ml Water Swallowing Test , 2003, Dysphagia.

[22]  平野 実 Clinical examination of voice , 1981 .