Real space channelization for generic DBT system image quality evaluation with channelized Hotelling observer

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a relatively new 3D mammography technique that promises better detection of low contrast masses than conventional 2D mammography. The parameter space for DBT is large however and finding an optimal balance between dose and image quality remains challenging. Given the large number of conditions and images required in optimization studies, the use of human observers (HO) is time consuming and certainly not feasible for the tuning of all degrees of freedom. Our goal was to develop a model observer (MO) that could predict human detectability for clinically relevant details embedded within a newly developed structured phantom for DBT applications. DBT series were acquired on GE SenoClaire 3D, Giotto Class, Fujifilm AMULET Innovality and Philips MicroDose systems at different dose levels, Siemens Inspiration DBT acquisitions were reconstructed with different algorithms, while a larger set of DBT series was acquired on Hologic Dimensions system for first reproducibility testing. A channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) with Gabor channels was developed The parameters of the Gabor channels were tuned on all systems at standard scanning conditions and the candidate that produced the best fit for all systems was chosen. After tuning, the MO was applied to all systems and conditions. Linear regression lines between MO and HO scores were calculated, giving correlation coefficients between 0.87 and 0.99 for all tested conditions.

[1]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. , 2014, Medical physics.

[3]  Koen Michielsen,et al.  Patchwork reconstruction with resolution modeling for digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2013, Medical physics.

[4]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Using the Hotelling observer on multi-slice and multi-view simulated SPECT myocardial images , 2001 .

[5]  H Bosmans,et al.  Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. , 2013, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Dance,et al.  Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Stephen J. Glick,et al.  Comparison of model and human observer performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing High Resolution Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Filtered Back Projection , 2014, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Human vs model observers in anatomic backgrounds , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[10]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) software for observer performance evaluation in radiology , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Development and application of a channelized Hotelling observer for DBT optimization on structured background test images with mass simulating targets , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.