Practical strategies to mitigate ruminant greenhouse gas emissions

Livestock contributes to 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, with ruminants being the largest contributor through enteric methane emissions. Although several strategies are available to mitigate livestock methane, no consensus exists on which methods are the most effective. Here, we projected by 2050 the impact of the most pragmatic strategies to reduce enteric methane, modelling cattle emissions. The projection shows that supplementing ruminant feed with anti-methanogenic seaweed and converting grassland into silvopasture offer the greatest potential to reduce emissions. A synergic combination of strategies can aid Europe and most of Asia to can reach ruminant carbon neutrality by 2035 and 2038, respectively. However, global cattle CO2-eq emissions will be reduced by no more than 34 percent by 2050, remaining far above the carbon neutrality target. Mitigation strategies alone are insufficient to lower emissions, and reducing the demand for ruminant products is also necessary – particularly in Africa and Western Asia.

[1]  E. Sills,et al.  A Discounted Cash Flow and Capital Budgeting Analysis of Silvopastoral Systems in the Amazonas Region of Peru , 2020, Land.

[2]  J. de Vente,et al.  Sustainable grazing land management to protect ecosystem services , 2020, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[3]  A. Engler,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices: Insights from Silvopastoral Systems of Colombia , 2020, Forests.

[4]  R. Nys,et al.  Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  J. P. Mueller,et al.  Community-based sheep breeding programs generated substantial genetic gains and socioeconomic benefits , 2020, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[6]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Inhibition of Rumen Protozoa by Specific Inhibitors of Lysozyme and Peptidases in vitro , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[7]  M. Cerón-Muñoz,et al.  Population structure and genetic diversity in Colombian Simmental cattle , 2019, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[8]  A. Duncan,et al.  Farmers’ Perceptions of Dairy Cattle Breeds, Breeding and Feeding Strategies: A Case of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Western Kenya , 2019, East African agricultural and forestry journal.

[9]  B. Kuhla,et al.  Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[10]  B. Malau-Aduli,et al.  Methane Emissions and the Use of Desmanthus in Beef Cattle Production in Northern Australia , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  L. S. Lopes,et al.  Could the breed composition improve performance and change the enteric methane emissions from beef cattle in a tropical intensive production system? , 2019, PloS one.

[12]  E. Halperin,et al.  A heritable subset of the core rumen microbiome dictates dairy cow productivity and emissions , 2019, Science Advances.

[13]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows , 2019, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[14]  B. Rischkowsky,et al.  Community-based breeding programmes are a viable solution for Ethiopian small ruminant genetic improvement but require public and private investments. , 2019, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[15]  S. Jose,et al.  Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system , 2019, Agroforestry Systems.

[16]  M. N. Haque Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants , 2018, Journal of animal science and technology.

[17]  M. Ebrahimi,et al.  Aspergillus terreus treated rice straw suppresses methane production and enhances feed digestibility in goats , 2018, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[18]  H. Claessens,et al.  Agroforestry for ruminants: a review of trees and shrubs as fodder in silvopastoral temperate and tropical production systems , 2018 .

[19]  E. Silbergeld,et al.  World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals , 2018, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control.

[20]  M. Yayota,et al.  AGRICULTURAL BY-PRODUCTS AS FEED FOR RUMINANTS IN TROPICAL AREA: NUTRITIVE VALUE AND MITIGATING METHANE EMISSION , 2017 .

[21]  A. Duncan,et al.  Assessment of lifetime performance of small ruminants under different feeding systems. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[22]  Jiaping Wu,et al.  Can Seaweed Farming Play a Role in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation? , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[23]  C. Martin,et al.  Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal characteristics, methane emission, and milk fatty acid composition in cows fed high- or low-starch diets. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  Theodore E. Howard,et al.  Forage productivity and profitability in newly-established open pasture, silvopasture, and thinned forest production systems , 2016, Agroforestry Systems.

[25]  A. Reisinger,et al.  Improved ruminant genetics: Implementation guidance for policymakers and investors , 2016 .

[26]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Influence of ruminal methane on digesta retention and digestive physiology in non-lactating dairy cattle. , 2016, The British journal of nutrition.

[27]  R. Cowley,et al.  Optimising beef business performance in northern Australia: what can 30 years of commercial innovation teach us? , 2016 .

[28]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Dose-response effects of Asparagopsis taxiformis and Oedogonium sp. on in vitro fermentation and methane production , 2016, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[29]  J. Lassen,et al.  Heritability estimates for enteric methane emissions from Holstein cattle measured using noninvasive methods. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  Robert J. Wallace,et al.  Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[31]  N. McEwan,et al.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[32]  P. B. Pope,et al.  Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Zhisheng Wang,et al.  Immunization against Rumen Methanogenesis by Vaccination with a New Recombinant Protein , 2015, PloS one.

[34]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Community-based livestock breeding programmes: essentials and examples. , 2015, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[35]  B. Quack,et al.  Marine sources of bromoform in the global open ocean - global patterns and emissions , 2014 .

[36]  Dongwan D. Kang,et al.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome , 2014, Genome research.

[37]  H. Flint,et al.  Phylogenetic distribution of three pathways for propionate production within the human gut microbiota , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[38]  D. Feuz,et al.  The modern feedlot for finishing cattle. , 2014, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[39]  C. Martin,et al.  The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[40]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Three decades of global methane sources and sinks , 2013 .

[41]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Genomic selection using indicator traits to reduce the environmental impact of milk production. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  Alicia Calle,et al.  A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia , 2013 .

[43]  W. Oleszek,et al.  Plant components with specific activities against rumen methanogens. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[44]  S. López,et al.  Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites , 2012 .

[45]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Merging and characterising phenotypic data on conventional and rare traits from dairy cattle experimental resources in three countries. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[46]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. , 2012, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[47]  D. Yáñez-Ruiz,et al.  Effect of bromochloromethane on methane emission, rumen fermentation pattern, milk yield, and fatty acid profile in lactating dairy goats. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[48]  A. Patra Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[49]  Guosheng Su,et al.  A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[50]  M P L Calus,et al.  Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[51]  T. Shinkai,et al.  Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue , 2011, British Journal of Nutrition.

[52]  Rumi Tanoue,et al.  Residues of pharmaceutical products in recycled organic manure produced from sewage sludge and solid waste from livestock and relationship to their fermentation level. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[53]  A. Klieve,et al.  Does the complexity of the rumen microbial ecology preclude methane mitigation , 2011 .

[54]  S. Wiedemann,et al.  Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review , 2011 .

[55]  J. Philipsson,et al.  for tropical low- and medium input farming systems , 2011 .

[56]  C. Martin,et al.  Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[57]  B. McBride,et al.  Methanogens: Methane Producers of the Rumen and Mitigation Strategies , 2010, Archaea.

[58]  P. Janssen Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics , 2010 .

[59]  O. Hanotte,et al.  Time to Tap Africa's Livestock Genomes , 2010, Science.

[60]  C. Grainger,et al.  Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes long-term reduction of methane emissions from lactating dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[61]  D. Moran,et al.  Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[62]  William J. Kelly,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the Rumen Methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Reveals New Possibilities for Controlling Ruminant Methane Emissions , 2010, PloS one.

[63]  M. Denis,et al.  Development of a vaccine to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: Vaccination of sheep with methanogen fractions induces antibodies that block methane production in vitro , 2010, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[64]  R. A. Hunter,et al.  A bromochloromethane formulation reduces enteric methanogenesis in cattle fed grain-based diets , 2009 .

[65]  J. Saxena,et al.  Dietary phytochemicals as rumen modifiers: a review of the effects on microbial populations , 2009, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[66]  K. Becker,et al.  Inhibition of methanogens by bromochloromethane: effects on microbial communities and rumen fermentation using batch and continuous fermentations. , 2009, The British journal of nutrition.

[67]  L. Skillman,et al.  A Vaccine against Rumen Methanogens Can Alter the Composition of Archaeal Populations , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[68]  N. McEwan,et al.  Plant extracts to manipulate rumen fermentation , 2008 .

[69]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Avian (IgY) anti-methanogen antibodies for reducing ruminal methane production: in vitro assessment of their effects , 2008 .

[70]  T. Mcallister,et al.  Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis , 2008 .

[71]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review , 2008 .

[72]  Muhammad Ibrahim,et al.  Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua , 2007 .

[73]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Use of 'natural' products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[74]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Methane abatement strategies for cattle: Lipid supplementation of diets , 2007 .

[75]  I. Kosgey,et al.  GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF SMALL RUMINANTS IN LOW-INPUT, SMALLHOLDER PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: TECHNICAL AND INFRASTRUCTURAL ISSUES , 2007 .

[76]  P. Rogerson,et al.  Case control study of the geographic variability of exposure to disinfectant byproducts and risk for rectal cancer , 2007, International journal of health geographics.

[77]  I. Mueller-Harvey Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health , 2006 .

[78]  G. Griffith,et al.  The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industry , 2006 .

[79]  M. Tibbo Productivity and health of indigenous sheep breeds and crossbreds in the Central Ethiopian Highlands , 2006 .

[80]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  Use of Lotus corniculatus containing condensed tannins to increase lamb and wool production under co , 2004 .

[81]  A. Wright,et al.  Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. , 2004, Vaccine.

[82]  D. Massé,et al.  Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review , 2004 .

[83]  P. P. Rao,et al.  Importance of crop residues in crop–livestock systems in India and farmers’ perceptions of fodder quality in coarse cereals , 2003 .

[84]  P. Nair,et al.  Silvopastoral research and adoption in Central America: recent findings and recommendations for future directions , 2003, Agroforestry Systems.

[85]  I. Gordon,et al.  Can animals use foraging behaviour to combat parasites? , 2003, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[86]  A. Hristov,et al.  Evaluation of several potential bioactive agents for reducing protozoal activity in vitro , 2003 .

[87]  S. Manley,et al.  Phytogenesis of halomethanes: A product ofselection or a metabolic accident? , 2002 .

[88]  C. Pomar,et al.  Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach , 2001 .

[89]  A. R. Moss,et al.  Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming , 2000 .

[90]  G. Gribble The natural production of organobromine compounds , 2000, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[91]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep , 1999 .

[92]  D. Johnson,et al.  Estimates of animal methane emissions , 1996, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[93]  N. Kenya Montreal Protocol Parties: Adjustments and Amendments to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer , 1991, International Legal Materials.

[94]  J. Jouany,et al.  Effect of defaunating the rumen , 1988 .

[95]  J. Eadie,et al.  Methane formation in faunated and ciliate-free cattle and its relationship with rumen volatile fatty acid proportions , 1984, British Journal of Nutrition.

[96]  R. Thauer,et al.  Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: An explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate , 1982, Archives of Microbiology.

[97]  T. Klopfenstein,et al.  Effects of defaunation on feed digestibility rumen metabolism and blood metabolites. , 1966, Journal of animal science.

[98]  Ziping Wu Antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals in China , 2019, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers.

[99]  World Livestock Transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .

[100]  M. V. Vilariño,et al.  Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development , 2018 .

[101]  A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi,et al.  Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation , 2017 .

[102]  J. K. Wang,et al.  Effect of yeast culture and its combination with direct-fed microbials on growth performance and rumen fermentation of weaned lambs , 2017 .

[103]  Quick Guidance,et al.  Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool (EX-ACT) , 2017 .

[104]  Reducing enteRic methane for improving food security and livelihoods , 2016 .

[105]  R. Nys,et al.  Asparagopsis taxiformis decreases enteric methane production from sheep , 2016 .

[106]  J. Lassen,et al.  METHAGENE - Towards large-scale methane measurements on individual ruminants for genetic evaluations , 2015 .

[107]  I. Amata The use of non-conventional feed resources (NCFR) for livestock feeding inthe tropics: A Review , 2015 .

[108]  E. Salvador Climate-Smart Agriculture in , 2014 .

[109]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[110]  R. Sessa,et al.  Climate-smart agriculture: sourcebook. , 2013 .

[111]  A. Mcleod,et al.  World livestock 2011 - livestock in food security. , 2011 .

[112]  J. McEwan,et al.  Genetic opportunities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminant livestock , 2010 .

[113]  M. Wallace,et al.  Simulation modelling of the cost of producing and utilising feeds for ruminants on Irish farms. , 2010 .

[114]  N. Maheri-Sis,et al.  Nutritive Value of Some Agro-Industrial By-products for Ruminants - A Review , 2008 .

[115]  M. R. Mosquera-Losada,et al.  How much carbon can be stored in Canadian agroecosystems using a silvopastoral approach , 2005 .

[116]  M. Eugène,et al.  Quantitative meta-analysis on the effects of defaunation of the rumen on growth, intake and digestion in ruminants , 2004 .

[117]  J. P. Mueller,et al.  Experiences with a large scale sheep genetic improvement project in the Peruvian highlands. , 2002 .

[118]  Tanaka The role of , 2000, Journal of insect physiology.

[119]  R. Melnick NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Tribromomethane (Bromoform) (CAS No. 75-25-2) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies). , 1989, National Toxicology Program technical report series.

[120]  W. F. J. Cuthbertson Vitamin B12. , 1950, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[121]  N. Doblhamer Vitamin B12. , 1950, Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift.

[122]  Administrative guidance for the preparation of applications on additives for use in animal nutrition , 2022, EFSA Supporting Publications.