Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning.

The existence of sound-symbolism (or a non-arbitrary link between form and meaning) is well-attested. However, sound-symbolism has mostly been investigated with nonwords in forced choice tasks, neither of which are representative of natural language. This study uses ideophones, which are naturally occurring sound-symbolic words that depict sensory information, to investigate how sensitive Dutch speakers are to sound-symbolism in Japanese in a learning task. Participants were taught 2 sets of Japanese ideophones; 1 set with the ideophones' real meanings in Dutch, the other set with their opposite meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned the ideophones and their real meanings much better than the ideophones with their opposite meanings. Moreover, despite the learning rounds, participants were still able to guess the real meanings of the ideophones in a 2-alternative forced-choice test after they were informed of the manipulation. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is robust beyond 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms and affects broader language processes such as word learning. In Experiment 2, participants learned regular Japanese adjectives with the same manipulation, and there was no difference between real and opposite conditions. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is especially strong in ideophones, and that people learn words better when form and meaning match. The highlights of this study are as follows: (a) Dutch speakers learn real meanings of Japanese ideophones better than opposite meanings, (b) Dutch speakers accurately guess meanings of Japanese ideophones, (c) this sensitivity happens despite learning some opposite pairings, (d) no such learning effect exists for regular Japanese adjectives, and (e) this shows the importance of sound-symbolism in scaffolding language learning. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  Mark E Aveyard Some consonants sound curvy: Effects of sound symbolism on object recognition , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Hanako Yoshida,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic Study of Sound Symbolism in Children's Verb Learning , 2012, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[3]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  C. Spence,et al.  “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners , 2013, Cognition.

[5]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[6]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Cross-linguistic sound symbolism and crossmodal correspondence: Evidence from fMRI and DTI , 2014, Brain and Language.

[7]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language , 2001 .

[9]  S. Kita,et al.  The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  How does it hurt, kiri-kiri or siku-siku? Japanese mimetic words of pain perceived by Japanese speakers and English speakers , 2007 .

[11]  S. Kita,et al.  Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning , 2008, Cognition.

[12]  S. Kunihira,et al.  Effects of the expressive voice on phonetic symbolism , 1971 .

[13]  Akita Kimi Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words , 2011 .

[14]  秋田 喜美 A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese : theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics , 2009 .

[15]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[16]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Language-specific properties of the lexicon: Implications for learning and processing , 2006 .

[17]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[18]  D. Rendall,et al.  Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Valeria Occelli,et al.  The Takete—Maluma Phenomenon in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2013, Perception.

[21]  E. Sapir A study in phonetic symbolism. , 1929 .

[22]  Lorijn Zaadnoordijk,et al.  Sound-Symbolism is Disrupted in Dyslexia: Implications for the Role of Cross-Modal Abstraction Processes , 2015, CogSci.

[23]  L. Nygaard,et al.  The Semantics of Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence of Prosodic Correlates to Word Meaning , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[25]  Catherine Laing A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production , 2014 .

[26]  S. Kita,et al.  Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants , 2015, Cortex.

[27]  Patrick D. Thompson,et al.  Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function , 2011, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[28]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yota-yota?: A cross-linguistic investigation of mimetic words for laughing and walking , 2007 .

[29]  Shoko Hamano The sound-symbolic system of Japanese , 2000 .

[30]  W. Köhler Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology , 1970 .

[31]  R. Davis The fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. , 1961, British journal of psychology.

[32]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning , 2009, Cognition.

[33]  H. Oda An embodied semantic mechanism for mimetic words in Japanese , 2000 .

[34]  Stanley S. Newman Further experiments in phonetic symbolism , 1933 .