Influence of pelvic floor muscle contraction on the profile of vaginal closure pressure in continent and stress urinary incontinent women.

PURPOSE We characterized the vaginal pressure profile as a representation of closure forces along the length and circumference of the vaginal wall. Vaginal pressure profile data were used to test the hypothesis that the strength of pelvic floor muscle contractions differs significantly between continent women and women with stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Vaginal pressure profile recordings were made in 23 continent subjects and in 10 patients with stress urinary incontinence. The recordings characterized closure forces along the entire length of the vagina and identified differences among the anterior, posterior, left and right sides of the vaginal wall. Using a novel, directionally sensitive vaginal probe we made vaginal pressure profile measurements with the women at rest and during pelvic floor muscle contraction while supine. RESULTS The nature of the vaginal pressure profile was characterized in terms of force distribution in the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, which was significantly greater than that on the left and right sides. The continent group had significant greater maximum pressure than the stress urinary incontinence group on the posterior side at rest (mean +/- SE 3.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.01 +/- 0.36 N/cm(2)) and during pelvic floor muscle contraction (4.18 +/- 0.26 vs 2.25 +/- 0.41 N/cm(2)). The activity pressure difference between the posterior and anterior vaginal walls in the continent group was significantly increased when the pelvic floor muscles contracted vs that at rest (3.29 +/- 0.21 vs 2.45 +/- 0.26 N/cm(2)). However, the change observed in the stress urinary incontinence group was not significant (1.85 +/- 0.38 vs 1.35 +/- 0.27 N/cm(2)). CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that the voluntary pelvic floor muscles impose significant closure forces along the vaginal wall of continent women but not in women with stress urinary incontinence. The implication of these findings is that extrinsic urethral closure pressure is insufficiently augmented by pelvic floor muscle contraction in women with stress urinary incontinence.

[1]  J M Miller,et al.  Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction During a Cough and Decreased Vesical Neck Mobility , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  D. Pretorius,et al.  The vaginal pressure profile , 2005, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[3]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions , 2005 .

[4]  K. Salvesen,et al.  Pelvic floor muscle strength and thickness in continent and incontinent nulliparous pregnant women , 2004, International Urogynecology Journal.

[5]  S. Emery,et al.  Prospective Double Blind Controlled Trial of Intensive Physiotherapy with and without Stimulation of the Pelvic Floor in Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence , 1991 .

[6]  D Bourbonnais,et al.  Development of a dynamometer for measuring the isometric force of the pelvic floor musculature , 2003, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[7]  K. Bø.  Pressure measurements during pelvic floor muscle contractions: The effect of different positions of the vaginal measuring device , 1992 .

[8]  D. Vodušek,et al.  Pelvic floor activity patterns: comparison of nulliparous continent and parous urinary stress incontinent women. A kinesiological EMG study. , 1994, British journal of urology.

[9]  D. Jerwood,et al.  Does Pre-modulated Interferential Therapy Cure Genuine Stress Incontinence? , 1993 .

[10]  Sadao Omata,et al.  Direction sensitive sensor probe for the evaluation of voluntary and reflex pelvic floor contractions , 2007, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[11]  C. Fowler,et al.  Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: Report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society , 2005, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[12]  Christos E. Constantinou,et al.  2D Ultrasound Image Processing in Identifying Responses of Urogenital Structures to Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  H. Feys,et al.  Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women , 2004, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[14]  M. Verelst,et al.  Are fatigue and disturbances in pre‐programmed activity of pelvic floor muscles associated with female stress urinary incontinence? , 2004, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[15]  J R Fielding,et al.  Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  D Gravel,et al.  Pelvic floor muscle function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women using dynamometric measurements , 2004, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[17]  Sadao Omata,et al.  Spatial distribution of vaginal closure pressures of continent and stress urinary incontinent women , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[18]  T. Dimpfl,et al.  Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Using Four Different Techniques , 2001, International Urogynecology Journal.

[19]  D. Pretorius,et al.  Vaginal high-pressure zone assessed by dynamic 3-dimensional ultrasound images of the pelvic floor. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  K. Moore.  Conservative management for urinary incontinence. , 2000, Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.