Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university–industry technology transfer

Cross-border "emulation" of economic and technology policies among industrial-economy governments has become common in recent years, and spans policies ranging from intellectual property rights to collaborative R&D. Recent initiatives by a number of industrial-economy governments suggest considerable interest in emulating the Bayh--Dole Act of 1980, a piece of legislation that is widely credited with stimulating significant growth in university--industry technology transfer and research collaboration in the United States. I examine the effects of Bayh--Dole on university--industry collaboration and technology transfer in the United States, emphasizing the lengthy history of both activities prior to 1980 and noting the extent to which these activities are rooted in the incentives created by the unusual scale and structure (by comparison with Western Europe or Japan) of the US higher education system. Efforts at "emulation" of the Bayh--Dole policy by other governments are likely to have modest success at best without greater attention to the underlying structural differences among the higher education systems of these nations. Copyright 2011 The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Divergent Paths or Stepping Stones: A Comparison of Scientists’ Advising and Founding Activities , 2008 .

[2]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[3]  John Walsh,et al.  Research Tool Patenting and Licensing and Biomedical Innovation , 2003 .

[4]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[6]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Universities in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[7]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Patenting Amid Changing Incentives for Commercialization , 1998 .

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[9]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[11]  Robert A. Lowe The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions: Startup licensees at the University of California , 2001 .

[12]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[13]  R. Lowe,et al.  Who Develops a University Invention? The Impact of Tacit Knowledge and Licensing Policies , 2006 .

[14]  R. Nelson,et al.  The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate , 1998 .

[15]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Commercializing university research. Lessons from the experience of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[17]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .

[20]  W. Roush Secrecy Dispute Pits Brown Researcher Against Company , 1997, Science.

[21]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors: Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[22]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[23]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Christian Kilger,et al.  New Rules for German Professors , 2002, Science.

[25]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research , 1996 .

[26]  L. Minvielle-Sebastia,et al.  Coupling termination of transcription to messenger RNA maturation in yeast. , 1998, Science.

[27]  R. Eisenberg,et al.  Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine , 2002, American Scientist.

[28]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[29]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[30]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  R and D Cooperation and Competition , 1990 .

[31]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[32]  M. Deutsch Cooperation and competition , 2011, The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology.

[33]  David C. Mowery,et al.  University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925–1980 , 2001 .

[34]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[35]  J. Lerner,et al.  The University and the Start-Up:Lessons from the Past Two Decades , 2004 .

[36]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[37]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Risky Business: Universities and Intellectual Property. , 2001 .

[38]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  Examining the Marketplace for Ideas: How Local are Europe’s Biotechnology Clusters? , 2004 .

[39]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation , 2001 .

[40]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[41]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions , 1994 .

[42]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[43]  R. Nelson,et al.  The evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change , 2000 .