Hyperspectral species mapping for automatic weed control in tomato under thermal environmental stress

Highlights? Thermal stress affects tomato canopy reflectance in 480-670 and 720-810nm. ? Temperature-dependent classification performances ranging from 62.5% to 91.6%. ? Omission of 480-670nm stabilizes crop/weed discrimination with 86.4% accuracy. ? Site-specific calibration mitigates extreme temperature effects with 90.3% accuracy. ? Global calibration achieves optimum accuracy of 92.2% for robust plant recognition. This work studied the impacts of variations in environmental temperature on hyperspectral imaging features in the visible and near infrared regions for robust species identification for weed mapping in tomato production. Six major Californian processing tomato cultivars, black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) were grown under a variety of diurnal temperature ranges simulating conditions common in the Californian springtime planting period and one additional treatment simulating greenhouse growing conditions. The principal change in canopy reflectance with varying temperature occurred in the 480-670 and 720-810nm regions. The overall classification rate ranged from 62.5% to 91.6% when classifiers trained under single temperatures were applied to plants grown at different temperatures. Eliminating the 480-670nm region from the classifier's feature set mitigated the temperature effect by stabilizing the total crop vs. weed classification rate at 86.4% over the temperature ranges. A site-specific recalibration method was also successful in alleviating the bias created by calibrating the models on the extreme temperatures and increased the classification accuracy to 90.3%. A global calibration method, incorporating all four temperature conditions in the classifier feature space, provided the best average total classification accuracy of 92.2% out of the methods studied, and was fairly robust to the varying diurnal temperature conditions.

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Potential for automatic weed detection and selective herbicide application , 1991 .

[3]  J. Shenk,et al.  Application of NIR Spectroscopy to Agricultural Products , 1992 .

[4]  Emil W. Ciurczak,et al.  Handbook of Near-Infrared Analysis , 1992 .

[5]  Colm P. O'Donnell,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging – an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control , 2007 .

[6]  Frank Klawonn,et al.  Evolving Extended Naive Bayes Classifiers , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining - Workshops (ICDMW'06).

[7]  G. Guyot,et al.  2 – OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF VEGETATION CANOPIES , 1990 .

[8]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review , 2008 .

[9]  D. K. Giles,et al.  DISCRIMINATING WEEDS FROM PROCESSING TOMATO PLANTS USING VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY , 2004 .

[10]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[11]  E. Martin 2009 Final Report , 2010 .

[12]  M. Mcgiffen,et al.  Competition for Light Between Tomatoes and Nightshades (Solanum nigrum or S. ptycanthum) , 1992, Weed Science.

[13]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Graphical Techniques for Multivariate Data. , 1978 .

[14]  B. R. MacKay,et al.  Applications of Canonical Discriminant Analysis in Horticultural Research , 1994 .

[15]  G. T. Nightingale Effects of Temperature on Metabolism in Tomato , 1933, Botanical Gazette.

[16]  Christopher Hertzog On Pooling Covariance Matrices for Multivariate Analysis , 1986 .

[17]  T. Borregaard,et al.  Crop–weed Discrimination by Line Imaging Spectroscopy , 2000 .

[18]  M. D. Steven,et al.  Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture , 2011 .

[19]  W. Brien Henry,et al.  Spectral reflectance curves to distinguish soybean from common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) grown with varying soil moisture , 2004, Weed Science.

[20]  Rainer H. Biller,et al.  Reduced input of herbicides by use of optoelectronic sensors , 1998 .

[21]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  Multispectral Machine Vision Identification of Lettuce and Weed Seedlings for Automated Weed Control , 2008, Weed Technology.

[22]  J. De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Weed Detection Using Canopy Reflection , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[23]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  A review of spectral properties of plants and their potential use for crop/weed discrimination in row-crops , 1998 .

[24]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  Hyperspectral Imaging System for Precision Weed Control in Processing Tomato , 2009 .

[25]  D. C. Sanders,et al.  Influence of Four Weed Species on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Direct-Seeded Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) , 1981, Weed Science.