Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

PURPOSE To determine effective dose (ED) per unit dose-length product (DLP) conversion factors for computed tomographic (CT) dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS A CT dosimetry spreadsheet was used to compute patient ED values and corresponding DLP values. The ratio of ED to DLP was determined with 16-section CT scanners from four vendors, as well as with five models from one manufacturer that spanned more than 25 years. ED-to-DLP ratios were determined for 2-cm scan lengths along the patient axis, as well as for typical scan lengths encountered at head and body CT examinations. The dependence of the ratio of ED to DLP on x-ray tube voltage (in kilovolts) was investigated, and the values obtained with the spreadsheet were compared with those obtained by using two other commercially available CT dosimetry software packages. RESULTS For 2-cm scan lengths, changes in the scan region resulted in differences to ED of a factor of 30, but much lower variation was obtained for typical scan lengths at clinical head and body imaging. Inter- and intramanufacturer differences for ED/DLP were generally small. Representative values of ED/DLP at 120 kV were 2.2 microSv/mGy x cm (head scans), 5.4 microSv/mGy x cm (cervical spine scans), and 18 microSv/mGy x cm (body scans). For head scans, ED/DLP was approximately independent of x-ray tube voltage, but for body scans, the increase from 80 to 140 kV increased the ratio of ED to DLP by approximately 25%. Agreement in ED/DLP data for all three software packages was generally very good, except for cervical spine examinations where one software package determined an ED/DLP ratio that was approximately double that of the other two. CONCLUSION This article describes a method of providing CT users with a practical and reliable estimate of adult patient EDs by using the DLP displayed on the CT console at the end of any given examination.

[1]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[2]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  W. Huda,et al.  Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography , 2002 .

[4]  J. W. Vieira,et al.  All about FAX: a Female Adult voXel phantom for Monte Carlo calculation in radiation protection dosimetry. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  W Panzer,et al.  Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[6]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  P J Eifel,et al.  Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[9]  E. Nickoloff,et al.  Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. , 2003, Medical physics.

[10]  N. Theocharopoulos,et al.  Estimation of effective doses to adult and pediatric patients from multislice computed tomography: A method based on energy imparted. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[12]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[13]  G. Brix,et al.  Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study , 2004, European Radiology.

[14]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[15]  G. Iball,et al.  Assessment of tube current modulation in pelvic CT. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[17]  R. Doll,et al.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Wall,et al.  Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements , 1994 .

[19]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[20]  W Huda Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[22]  W. Eckelman,et al.  NCRP report no. 93: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland (1987). US$15.00 , 1988 .

[23]  J. Ravenel The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed. , 2003 .