ICANN or ICANN't Represent Internet Users

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is the organization that provides the technical support for the Internet. ICANN is a nonprofit organization based in California and is under contract to the United States Department of Commerce. It has come under attack from many sides because it is contracted through the U.S. government and it is a private entity. One of the main components of the controversy surrounding ICANN is whether it can represent a global society as a private entity and whether that private entity can represent Internet users. I focus my study on ICANN’s Board of Directors. I evaluated the Board on the dimensions of descriptive, substantive, and formal representation (Pitkin 1967). Evaluation of ICANN’s descriptive representation focused on the Board members’ sex, educational backgrounds, and nationalities and compared the geographic representation on the Board to the global distribution of Internet users. The assessment of substantive representation looked at the Board members’ votes to determine if patterns could be viewed based on members’ descriptive characteristics. Finally, the evaluation of ICANN’s formal representation examined its Bylaws, its 2006 contract with the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporations Code. The analysis found that the descriptive representativeness was low. The ICANN Board does not mirror Internet users: few women have served on the Board, those with technical educational backgrounds dominated, and the regions were not represented proportionate to their use of the Internet. Analysis of substantive representativeness was

[1]  Jonathan G. S. Koppell.  Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder” , 2005 .

[2]  K. Hill,et al.  Dyadic representation reappraised. , 1999 .

[3]  D. Ra.  ICANN and the Concept of Democratic Deficit , 2003 .

[4]  Julie Siciliano,et al.  The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance , 1996 .

[5]  Jose Ma. Emmanuel A. Caral.  Lessons from ICANN: Is self-regulation of the Internet fundamentally flawed? , 2004, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[6]  Kathleen E. Fuller.  ICANN: The Debate Over Governing the Internet , 2001 .

[7]  Vernon Bogdanor.  What is proportional representation? : a guide to the issues , 1984 .

[8]  Durwood Ruegger,et al.  A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics , 1992 .

[9]  Robert Weissberg.  Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[10]  A. Hintze,et al.  Measuring Representation , 2010 .

[11]  Deon Nel,et al.  An examination of the ethical beliefs of managers using selected scenarios in a cross-cultural environment , 1992 .

[12]  H. Becker,et al.  Business ethics: A cross-cultural comparison of managers' attitudes , 1987 .

[13]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[14]  D. I. Hawkins,et al.  Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education , 1972 .

[15]  James Poon Teng Fatt.  Perceptions of Information Technology in Higher Education , 2002 .

[16]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[17]  Robert E. Stevens,et al.  Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers" Myth or Reality? , 1987 .

[18]  Wolfgang Kleinwächter.  ICANN between technical mandate and political challenges , 2000 .

[19]  Thomas Schwartz.  The Paradox of Representation , 1995, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  The Power and Functions of Boards of Directors: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  K. Cameron.  Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[22]  M. Christie,et al.  Nonprofit Boards in Australia: A Distinctive Governance Approach , 2001 .

[23]  Konstantinos Komaitis,et al.  ICANN's role in controlling information on the internet , 2003 .

[24]  Vinton G. Cerf,et al.  A protocol for packet network intercommunication , 1974, CCRV.

[25]  Daniel F. Spulber,et al.  Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce , 2001 .

[26]  H. N. Butler,et al.  Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition , 1985 .

[27]  Lily Shashaani.  Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and Use among College Students , 1997 .

[28]  Michael Geist,et al.  Fair.com?: An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP , 2001 .

[29]  Larry Roberts,et al.  The Arpanet and computer networks , 1986, ACM Conference on history of personal workstations.

[30]  The feasibility of global democracy: understanding ICANN’s at‐large election , 2001 .

[31]  David C. G. Brown,et al.  Electronic government and public administration , 2005 .

[32]  Milton L. Mueller,et al.  The battle over Internet domain names: Global or national TLDs? , 1998 .

[33]  Volker Leib.  ICANN - EU can't: Internet governance and Europe's role in the formation of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) , 2002, Telematics Informatics.

[34]  J. Pfeffer.  Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[35]  W. Kleinwächter.  From Self-Governance to Public-Private Partnership: The Changing Role of Governments in the Management of the Internet's Core Resources , 2003 .

[36]  R. Herman,et al.  Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness: Contrasts Between Especially Effective and Less Effective Organizations , 1998 .

[37]  J. Abbate,et al.  Inventing the Internet , 1999 .

[38]  M. Weatherford.  Mapping the Ties That Bind: Legitimacy, Representation, and Alienation , 1991 .

[39]  A. Michael Froomkin,et al.  Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using Icann to Route Around the APA and the Constitution , 2000 .

[40]  Kanak Gautam,et al.  The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change , 1994 .

[41]  John E. McClusky.  RE-THINKING NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION GOVERNANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP , 2002 .

[42]  Tim Wu,et al.  Who Controls the Internet , 2006 .

[43]  Suzanne Dovi.  The Good Representative , 2007 .

[44]  Juliet A. Musso,et al.  Representation in Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[45]  C. Rosenthal.  The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation , 1995 .

[46]  C. Cameron,et al.  Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress? , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Milton L. Mueller.  ICANN and Internet governance: sorting through the debris of “self‐regulation” , 1999 .

[48]  H. Pitkin.  The Concept of Representation , 1969 .

[49]  E. Brody.  The Legal Framework for Nonprofit Organizations , 2006 .

[50]  M. Stone,et al.  Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects , 2006 .

[51]  W. Brown.  Inclusive Governance Practices in Nonprofit Organizations and Implications for Practice , 2002 .

[52]  H. Ostensen,et al.  for Developing Countries , 2006 .

[53]  Hans Klein,et al.  ICANN and Internet Governance: Leveraging Technical Coordination to Realize Global Public Policy , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[54]  Claudine Gay,et al.  Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government , 2002 .

[55]  R. Herman,et al.  Board Practices of Especially Effective and Less Effective Local Nonprofit Organizations , 2000 .

[56]  J. Pfeffer.  Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization-Environment Linkage , 1973 .

[57]  M. Lee.  Linking Governance and Performance: ICANN as an Internet Hybrid , 2008 .

[58]  Thomas M. Jones,et al.  Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives , 1988 .

[59]  Yan Tian,et al.  Framing the digital divide: a comparison of US and EU policy approaches , 2006, New Media Soc..

[60]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Concerns of college students regarding business ethics , 1984 .

[61]  S. Skinner,et al.  Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations , 1988 .

[62]  Chris T. Owens.  Black Substantive Representation in State Legislatures from 1971–1994* , 2005 .

[63]  I. King,et al.  Internationalising internet governance: does ICANN have a role to play? , 2004 .

[64]  J. Palfrey.  The End of the Experiment: How ICANN's Foray into Global Internet Democracy Failed , 2004 .

[65]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature , 1994 .

[66]  Martin Knapp,et al.  The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook , 2006 .

[67]  Jeffrey L. Callen,et al.  Board Composition, Committees, and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Nonprofits , 2003 .

[68]  ICANN 2.0: Meet the New Boss , 2003 .

[69]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Global Governance and Democratic Accountability , 2002 .

[70]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment , 1978 .

[71]  D. Paré.  Internet Governance in Transition: Who Is the Master of This Domain? , 2002 .

[72]  Gene R. Laczniak,et al.  The influence of stated organizational concern upon ethical decision making , 1987 .

[73]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination , 1985 .

[74]  David L. Epstein,et al.  Measuring the Electoral and Policy Impact of Majority-Minority Voting Districts: Candidates of Choic , 1999 .

[75]  Gary M. Segura,et al.  Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation Among Latinos , 2003 .

[76]  Thomas W. Whipple,et al.  Business ethics judgments: A cross-cultural comparison , 1992 .

[77]  Leadership Styles between Technical and Non-Technical Superiors: Guess Who Will Give Subordinates More Freedom on the Job? , 2004 .

[78]  Alfred Vernis,et al.  Nonprofit Organizations: Challenges and Collaboration , 2006 .

[79]  Rikki Abzug,et al.  Nonprofit Boards: Crucibles of Expertise or Symbols of Local Identities? , 2001 .

[80]  G. Christou,et al.  Gaining a Stake in Global Internet Governance , 2007 .