A Comparison of the SOFM with LVQ, SOFM without LVQ and Statistical Technique

The shapes and firing rates of MUAP‘s (motor unit action potentials) in an EMG (electromyographic) signal provide an important source of information for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. In order to extract this information from EMG signals recorded at low to moderate force levels, it is required: i) to identify the MUAP‘s composing the EMG signal, ii) to classify MUAP‘s with similar shape. For the classification of MUAP‘s two different pattern recognition techniques are presented: i) An artificial neural network (ANN) technique based on unsupervised learning, using a modified version of the self-organizing feature maps (SOFM) algorithm and learning vector quantization (LVQ), and ii) A statistical pattern recognition technique based on Euclidean distance. A total of 521 MUAP‘s obtained from 2 normal subjects, 4 subjects suffering from myopathy, and 5 subjects suffering from motor neuron disease were analyzed. The success rate for the ANN technique was 97.6% , the success rate for SOFM technique was 94.8%, and for statistical technique it was 95.3%. So SOFM technique along with LVQ is batter technology than the SOFM without LVQ technique and Statistical technique.

[1]  E Stålberg,et al.  Multi-MUP EMG analysis--a two year experience in daily clinical work. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  C S Pattichis,et al.  Medical diagnostic systems: a case for neural networks. , 1994, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[3]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Neural network models in EMG diagnosis , 1995 .

[5]  S Andreassen,et al.  Methods for computer-aided measurement of motor unit parameters. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[6]  R. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[7]  L J Dorfman,et al.  AAEE minimonograph #29: Automatic quantitative electromyography , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990, Neurocomputing.

[9]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[10]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Introduction to neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[11]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  An introduction to neural networks , 2018 .

[13]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials-Part II: Execution and Test for Accuracy , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.