The relationship between hospital case volume and outcome from carotid endartectomy in England from 2000 to 2005.

OBJECTIVES To assess the outcome of carotid endarterectomy in England with respect to the hospital case-volume. METHODS Data were from English Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005). Admissions were classified as elective or emergency. Risk-adjusted data were analysed through modelling of death rate, complication rate and length of admission with regard to the year of procedure and annual hospital volume of surgery. Hospitals with elevated death rates were identified and the evidence quantified that they had outlying mortality rates. RESULTS There were 280,081 diagnoses of extra-cranial atherosclerotic arterial disease in which 18,248 CEA were performed. The mean mortality rates were 1.04% for elective and 3.16% for emergency CEA. A volume-related improvement in mortality (p=0.047) was seen for elective CEA. Length of stay decreased as annual volume increased for elective and emergency CEA (p<0.001). 20% of the operations were performed in 67.1% of the hospitals, each of which performed fewer than 10 CEA per annum. A number of hospitals had elevated death rates. CONCLUSIONS Volume-related improvements in outcome were demonstrated for elective CEA. Minimum volume-criteria of 35 CEA per annum should be established in England. Hospitals performing low annual volumes of surgery should consider arrangements to network services.

[1]  P. Aylin,et al.  Descriptive study comparing routine hospital administrative data with the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland's National Vascular Database. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[2]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volume and Patient Mortality, 1998–2000 , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005 , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  E. Hannan,et al.  Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. , 1998, Stroke.

[6]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Meta‐analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  Herng‐Ching Lin,et al.  Association between surgeon and hospital volume in coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes: a population-based study. , 2006, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[8]  Richard J. Snow,et al.  Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy. , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[10]  J. Feinglass,et al.  The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  P. Shackley,et al.  Vascular patients' preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[12]  V. Hachinski,et al.  The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients. , 1999, Stroke.

[13]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery , 2004, The Lancet.

[14]  John A. Cowan,et al.  Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis , 2003, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York State, 1990-1995. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Demonstrating safety through in‐hospital mortality analysis following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  C. Warlow,et al.  Prediction of benefit from carotid endar terectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  E S Fisher,et al.  Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. , 1998, JAMA.

[20]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[21]  A. Jibawi,et al.  Defining the minimum hospital case‐load to achieve optimum outcomes in radical cystectomy , 2005, BJU international.