Evaluation of aerosol and cloud properties in three climate models using MODIS observations and its corresponding COSP simulator, and their application in aerosol-cloud interaction
暂无分享,去创建一个
U. Lohmann | G. de Leeuw | P. Kolmonen | D. Neubauer | H. Kokkola | A. Laaksonen | A. Arola | M. Sporre | L. Sogacheva | Giulia Saponaro | I. H. H. Karset
[1] J. Mülmenstädt,et al. Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2020, Reviews of geophysics.
[2] T. Stanelle,et al. The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.
[3] J. Quaas,et al. Is positive correlation between cloud droplet effective radius and aerosol optical depth over land due to retrieval artifacts or real physical processes? , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[4] B. Stevens,et al. Bounding aerosol radiative forcing of climate change , 2019 .
[5] Duncan Watson-Parris,et al. The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.
[6] N. McFarlane,et al. Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.
[7] T. Stanelle,et al. The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2019 .
[8] G. de Leeuw,et al. Satellite-based estimate of the variability of warm cloud properties associated with aerosol and meteorological conditions , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[9] A. Kirkevåg,et al. A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.
[10] U. Lohmann,et al. SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.
[11] Y. Wang,et al. Contrasting effects on deep convective clouds by different types of aerosols , 2018, Nature Communications.
[12] U. Lohmann,et al. The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2 , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[13] Hartwig Deneke,et al. Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives , 2018, Reviews of geophysics.
[14] A. Kirkevåg,et al. A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.
[15] Minghua Zhang,et al. Height Dependency of Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction Regimes , 2018 .
[16] M. Christensen,et al. Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 1: Cloud contamination in satellite products enhances the aerosol indirect forcing estimate , 2017 .
[17] U. Lohmann,et al. Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 2: Minimising the effects of aerosol swelling and wet scavenging in ECHAM6-HAM2 for comparison to satellite data , 2017 .
[18] U. Lohmann,et al. The chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 , 2017 .
[19] R. Bennartz,et al. Global and regional estimates of warm cloud droplet number concentration based on 13 years of AQUA-MODIS observations , 2017 .
[20] William B. Rossow,et al. Tropical cloud and precipitation regimes as seen from near‐simultaneous TRMM, CloudSat, and CALIPSO observations and comparison with ISCCP , 2017 .
[21] L. Oreopoulos,et al. Using MODIS cloud regimes to sort diagnostic signals of aerosol‐cloud‐precipitation interactions , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.
[22] Huadong Guo,et al. Analysis of aerosol effects on warm clouds over the Yangtze River Delta from multi-sensor satellite observations , 2017 .
[23] A. Bodas‐Salcedo,et al. A multi-diagnostic approach to cloud evaluation , 2016 .
[24] Steven Platnick,et al. The MODIS Cloud Optical and Microphysical Products: Collection 6 Updates and Examples From Terra and Aqua , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
[25] D. Ceburnis,et al. Six years of surface remote sensing of stratiform warm clouds in marine and continental air over Mace Head, Ireland , 2016 .
[26] Eric Guilyardi,et al. Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP , 2016 .
[27] G. Leeuw,et al. Estimates of the aerosol indirect effect over the Baltic Sea region derived from 12 years of MODIS observations , 2016 .
[28] N. Håkansson,et al. Comparison of MODIS and VIIRS cloud properties with ARM ground-based observations over Finland , 2016 .
[29] C. Bretherton,et al. Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol−cloud interactions in the climate system , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] A. Pier Siebesma,et al. The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6. , 2016 .
[31] N. Bellouin,et al. Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud fraction , 2016 .
[32] Kenneth S. Carslaw,et al. On the relationship between aerosol model uncertainty and radiative forcing uncertainty , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] S. Platnick,et al. MODIS Collection 6 shortwave-derived cloud phase classification algorithm and comparisons with CALIOP. , 2015, Atmospheric measurement techniques.
[34] Veronika Eyring,et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .
[35] Simon Read,et al. ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP , 2015 .
[36] J. Hudson,et al. MODIS comparisons with northeastern Pacific in situ stratocumulus microphysics , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.
[37] Andrew Gettelman,et al. Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions* , 2015 .
[38] Robert C. Levy,et al. MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .
[39] M. Kulmala,et al. Aerosol indirect effects on continental low-level clouds over Sweden and Finland , 2014 .
[40] Yong Wang,et al. Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5 , 2014 .
[41] Ling Jin,et al. Evaluating clouds, aerosols, and their interactions in three global climate models using satellite simulators and observations , 2014 .
[42] J. Seinfeld,et al. Satellite-based estimate of global aerosol-cloud radiative forcing by marine warm clouds , 2014 .
[43] P. Stier,et al. Cloud fraction mediates the aerosol optical depth‐cloud top height relationship , 2014 .
[44] L. Remer,et al. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .
[45] W. Collins,et al. Evaluation of climate models , 2013 .
[46] C. Bretherton,et al. Clouds and Aerosols , 2013 .
[47] B. Stevens,et al. Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .
[48] A. Kirkevåg,et al. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate , 2013 .
[49] Q. Min,et al. Comparison of MODIS cloud microphysical properties with in-situ measurements over the Southeast Pacific , 2012 .
[50] Philip Stier,et al. Investigating relationships between aerosol optical depth and cloud fraction using satellite, aerosol reanalysis and general circulation model data , 2012 .
[51] T. Storelvmo. Uncertainties in aerosol direct and indirect effects attributed to uncertainties in convective transport parameterizations , 2012 .
[52] L. Emmons,et al. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions , 2012 .
[53] Steven Platnick,et al. Effects of Cloud Horizontal Inhomogeneity and Drizzle on Remote Sensing of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius: Case Studies Based on Large-eddy Simulations , 2012 .
[54] Ivar A. Seierstad,et al. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections , 2012 .
[55] K. Bower,et al. Evaluating MODIS cloud retrievals with in situ observations from VOCALS-REx , 2012 .
[56] Michael Schulz,et al. Aerosol–climate interactions in the Norwegian Earth System Model – NorESM1-M , 2012 .
[57] Robert Pincus,et al. Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators , 2012 .
[58] F. Bréon,et al. Aerosol indirect effect on warm clouds over South-East Atlantic, from co-located MODIS and CALIPSO observations , 2012 .
[59] Lorraine A. Remer,et al. Aerosol-induced intensification of rain from the tropics to the mid-latitudes , 2012 .
[60] Paquita Zuidema,et al. Assessment of MODIS cloud effective radius and optical thickness retrievals over the Southeast Pacific with VOCALS‐REx in situ measurements , 2011 .
[61] Robert Pincus,et al. Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators in Climate Models , 2011 .
[62] G. Flato. Earth system models: an overview , 2011 .
[63] G. Feingold,et al. The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect effects , 2011 .
[64] John M. Haynes,et al. COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .
[65] J. Penner,et al. Satellite methods underestimate indirect climate forcing by aerosols , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[66] Paul Poli,et al. Atmospheric conservation properties in ERA‐Interim , 2011 .
[67] J. Thepaut,et al. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .
[68] A. Heidinger,et al. Regional assessment of microphysical properties of marine boundary layer cloud using the PATMOS‐x dataset , 2010 .
[69] Philip Stier,et al. A critical look at spatial scale choices in satellite-based aerosol indirect effect studies , 2010 .
[70] Robert C. Levy,et al. Evaluating the assumptions of surface reflectance and aerosol type selection within the MODIS aerosol retrieval over land: The problem of dust type selection , 2010 .
[71] S. Klein,et al. Evaluation of tropical cloud and precipitation statistics of Community Atmosphere Model version 3 using CloudSat and CALIPSO data , 2010 .
[72] J. Randerson,et al. Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2010 .
[73] Johannes Quaas,et al. Interpreting the cloud cover – aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model , 2009 .
[74] U. Lohmann,et al. Sensitivity studies of different aerosol indirect effects in mixed-phase clouds , 2009 .
[75] J. Lamarque,et al. Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .
[76] C. Bretherton,et al. The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .
[77] U. Lohmann,et al. Cirrus cloud formation and ice supersaturated regions in a global climate model , 2008 .
[78] Andrew Gettelman,et al. A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .
[79] S. Ghan,et al. A New Two-Moment Bulk Stratiform Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-Column and Global Results , 2008 .
[80] Ari Asmi,et al. SALSA – a Sectional Aerosol module for Large Scale Applications , 2007 .
[81] E. Vermote,et al. Second‐generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer spectral reflectance , 2007 .
[82] Robert F. Cahalan,et al. 3‐D aerosol‐cloud radiative interaction observed in collocated MODIS and ASTER images of cumulus cloud fields , 2007 .
[83] U. Lohmann,et al. Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2007 .
[84] D. Vaux,et al. Error bars in experimental biology , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.
[85] Yoram J. Kaufman,et al. On the twilight zone between clouds and aerosols , 2007 .
[86] Ralf Bennartz,et al. Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite , 2007 .
[87] Yoram J. Kaufman,et al. Aerosol-cloud interaction inferred from MODIS satellite data and global aerosol models , 2006 .
[88] Ulrike Lohmann,et al. Sensitivity Studies of the Importance of Dust Ice Nuclei for the Indirect Aerosol Effect on Stratiform Mixed-Phase Clouds , 2006 .
[89] U. Lohmann,et al. Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ and ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data , 2005 .
[90] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2004, Nature.
[91] J. Wilson,et al. M7: An efficient size‐resolved aerosol microphysics module for large‐scale aerosol transport models , 2004 .
[92] Johannes Quaas,et al. Aerosol indirect effects in POLDER satellite data and the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique–Zoom (LMDZ) general circulation model , 2004 .
[93] W. Collins,et al. Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .
[94] Hanna Pawlowska,et al. Cloud microphysical and radiative properties for parameterization and satellite monitoring of the indirect effect of aerosol on climate , 2003 .
[95] U. Lohmann,et al. A Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Homogeneous freezing including effects of aerosol size , 2002 .
[96] S. Ghan,et al. A parameterization of aerosol activation 3. Sectional representation , 2002 .
[97] Yoram J. Kaufman,et al. Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach , 2001 .
[98] S. Ghan,et al. A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .
[99] M. Khairoutdinov,et al. A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus , 2000 .
[100] Johann Feichter,et al. Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate model , 1996 .
[101] H. Treut,et al. A methodology study of the validation of clouds in GCMs using ISCCP satellite observations , 1996 .
[102] M. Tiedtke. A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .
[103] J. Kristjánsson,et al. Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model , 1989 .
[104] S. Twomey. The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .