The seismic hazard calculations for the 1996 national seismic hazard maps have been geographically deaggregated to assist in the understanding of the relative contributions of sources. These deaggregations are exhibited as maps with vertical bars whose heights are proportional to the contribution that each geographical cell makes to the ground-motion exceedance hazard. Bar colors correspond to average source magnitudes. We also extend the deaggregation analysis reported in Harmsen et al. (1999) to the western conterminous United States. In contrast to the central and eastern United States (CEUS); the influence of specific faults or characteristic events can be clearly identified.
Geographic deaggregation for 0.2-sec and 1.0-sec pseudo spectral acceleration (SA) is performed for 10% probability of exceedance (PE) in 50 yr (475-yr mean return period) and 2% PE in 50 yr (2475-yr mean return period) for four western U.S. cities, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, and Seattle, and for three central and eastern U.S. cities, Atlanta, Boston, and Saint Louis. In general, as the PE is lowered, the sources of hazard closer to the site dominate. Larger, more distant earthquakes contribute more significantly to hazard for 1.0-sec SA than for 0.2-sec SA. Additional maps of geographically deaggregated seismic hazard are available on the Internet for 120 cities in the conterminous United States ( ) for 1-sec SA and for 0.2-sec SA with a 2% PE in 50 yr.
Examination of these maps of hazard contributions enables the investigator to determine the distance and azimuth to predominant sources, and their magnitudes. This information can be used to generate scenario earthquakes and corresponding time histories for seismic design and retrofit. Where fault density is lower than deaggregation cell dimensions, we can identify specific faults that contribute significantly to the seismic hazard at a given site. Detailed fault information enables investigators to include rupture information such as source directivity, radiation pattern, and basin-edge effects into their scenario earthquakes used in engineering analyses.
[1]
C. Cornell.
Engineering seismic risk analysis
,
1968
.
[2]
Russell L. Wheeler,et al.
Earthquakes and the cratonward limit of Iapetan faulting in eastern North America
,
1995
.
[3]
R. Mcguire.
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop
,
1995,
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[4]
Martin C. Chapman,et al.
A probabilistic approach to ground-motion selection for engineering design
,
1995,
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[5]
D. Perkins,et al.
National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996
,
1996
.
[6]
William A. Bryant,et al.
Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of California
,
1996
.
[7]
C. Cramer,et al.
Predominant seismic source distance and magnitude maps for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties, California
,
1996,
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[8]
S. Harmsen,et al.
Deaggregation of probabilistic ground motions in the central and eastern United States
,
1999
.
[9]
C. Cornell,et al.
Disaggregation of seismic hazard
,
1999
.