Simultaneous Presentation of Multiple Documents and Text-Highlighting: Online Integrative Processes and Offline Integrated Understanding

This study examined the effect of the reading environment, i.e., documents presentation and possibility of text-highlighting, on readers’ integrated understanding, as well as the interplay between ...

[1]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict , 2013 .

[2]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Supporting Understanding Through Task and Browser Design , 2001 .

[3]  Alexandra List,et al.  Drawing is Integrating: An Examination of Students’ Graphic Representations of Multiple Texts , 2019, Reading Psychology.

[4]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: online comprehension processes and offline products , 2013 .

[6]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[7]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners , 2012, Reading Research Quarterly.

[8]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts , 2011 .

[9]  R. Fowler,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. , 1974 .

[10]  Sarit Barzilai,et al.  Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts: a Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices , 2018 .

[11]  T. Katzir,et al.  Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context , 2019, Contemporary Educational Psychology.

[13]  S. Wineburg.  Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence , 1991 .

[14]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use , 2009 .

[15]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Corroborating students’ self-reports of source evaluation , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  V. Zampa,et al.  Summarizing digital documents: effects of alternate or simultaneous window display , 2008 .

[17]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents , 2014 .

[19]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Effects of reading real versus print-out versions of multiple documents on students’ sourcing and integrated understanding , 2018 .

[20]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Learning with Multiple Documents , 2012 .

[21]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model , 2011 .

[22]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  S. Barzilai,et al.  Learning to integrate divergent information sources: the interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition , 2016, Metacognition and Learning.

[24]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) Model: Basic Assumptions and Preliminary Evidence , 2017 .

[25]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Comprehension of Multiple Documents With Conflicting Information: A Two-Step Model of Validation , 2017 .

[26]  Jocelyn H. Bolin,et al.  Hayes, Andrew F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press , 2014 .

[27]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  The contribution of text-highlighting to comprehension:A comparison of print and digital reading , 2018 .

[28]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  RESOLV: Readers' Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks , 2017 .

[29]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  The Influence of Critical Reading Orientation on External Strategy Use during Expository Text Reading , 2007 .

[30]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? , 2016 .

[31]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Paper vs. tablets: the effect of document media in co-located collaborative work , 2014, AVI.

[32]  Gary M. Schumacher,et al.  Effects of Motivation, Subject Activity, and Readability on the Retention of Prose Materials. , 1978 .

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Beliefs about justification for knowing when ethnic majority and ethnic minority students read multiple conflicting documents , 2016 .

[35]  Alexandra List,et al.  Toward a typology of integration: Examining the documents model framework , 2019, Contemporary Educational Psychology.

[36]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .

[37]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Spatially Distributed Instructions Improve Learning Outcomes and Efficiency. , 2011 .