How Substrate Properties Control Cell Adhesion. A Physical–Chemical Approach

Most living cells derived from solid tissues require an adhering surface to live in vitro conditions. A good understanding of the relationships between the behavior of cells and the physicochemical properties of substrates such as the surface free energy, the surface polarity, the presence of functional groups and surface charges is of prime importance for the optimization of adhesion, spreading and proliferation of cells. Polystyrene and treated polystyrene surfaces were characterized by determining their surface free energies using wettability measurements. The knowledge of the surface properties of the culture substrates provides a good view of the influence of the substrate properties on cell adhesion. However, this study shows that it is not directly the surface free energy of materials that controls cell adhesion but rather the interfacial free energy between the culture medium and the substrate. The interfacial free energy between the culture medium and the solid surface controls the adsorption of serum components that may inhibit or promote cell adhesion. One of the components inhibiting cell adhesion is serum albumin. The results indicate that the adsorption of serum albumin is related to the interfacial free energy between the culture medium and the substrate. Hydrophilic substrates, such as plasma treated polystyrene substrates, have a lower interfacial free energy with water than hydrophobic polystyrene leading to a lower adsorption of proteins inhibiting cell adhesion. In addition, it is observed that there is a competition between proteins inhibiting (serum albumin) and proteins promoting cell adhesion (such as fibronectin).

[1]  A. Carré,et al.  Cell Adhesion To Polystyrene Substrates: Relevance Of Interfacial Free Energy , 2008 .

[2]  A. Carré,et al.  Polar interactions at liquid/polymer interfaces , 2007 .

[3]  J. Joud,et al.  Adsorption from Dextran solutions: influence of stainless steel substrates , 2005 .

[4]  P. Bongrand,et al.  Is there a predictable relationship between surface physical-chemical properties and cell behaviour at the interface? , 2004, European cells & materials.

[5]  E. Vogler,et al.  Systematic variation in osteoblast adhesion and phenotype with substratum surface characteristics. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  Schneider,et al.  Influence of Substrate Hydrophobicity on the Adsorption of Collagen in the Presence of Pluronic F68, Albumin, or Calf Serum , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  Effect of preadsorbed proteins on cell adhesion to polymer surfaces , 1993 .

[8]  W. Hertl,et al.  Solubilization of corona discharge- and plasma-treated polystyrene , 1991 .

[9]  W. Hertl,et al.  Surface Modification of Polystyrene by Gamma-Radiation , 1990 .

[10]  R. W. Bussian,et al.  Short-term cell-attachment rates: a surface-sensitive test of cell-substrate compatibility. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces , 1986 .

[12]  W. Ramsey,et al.  Surface treatments and cell attachment , 1984, In Vitro.

[13]  J V Forrester,et al.  The competitive effects of serum proteins on cell adhesion. , 1984, Journal of cell science.

[14]  P. Knox Kinetics of cell spreading in the presence of different concentrations of serum or fibronectin-depleted serum. , 1984, Journal of cell science.

[15]  J. Forrester,et al.  Comparison of Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements by Auscultation and Visual Manometer Needle Jump , 2019, International journal of exercise science.

[16]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces detected by antibody binding and analyzed during cell adhesion in serum-containing medium. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  F. Fowkes,et al.  Contact angles and the equilibrium spreading pressures of liquids on hydrophobic solids , 1980 .

[18]  W. Zingg,et al.  Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of platelet adhesion from suspension to various substrates. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  P. Hartman,et al.  Adaptation of plastic surfaces for tissue culture by glow discharge , 1975, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[20]  A. Neumann,et al.  An equation-of-state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact angles , 1974 .

[21]  J. R. Dann Forces involved in the adhesive process , 1970 .

[22]  F. Fowkes ATTRACTIVE FORCES AT INTERFACES , 1964 .

[23]  E. H. Lucassen-Reynders CONTACT ANGLES AND ADSORPTION ON SOLIDS1,2 , 1963 .

[24]  F. Fowkes,et al.  DETERMINATION OF INTERFACIAL TENSIONS, CONTACT ANGLES, AND DISPERSION FORCES IN SURFACES BY ASSUMING ADDITIVITY OF INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS IN SURFACES , 1962 .

[25]  S. Perni,et al.  An investigation of microbial adhesion to natural and synthetic polysaccharide-based films and its relationship with the surface energy components , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[26]  G. Yampolskaya,et al.  Properties of protein interfacial layers at liquid-fluid interfaces , 1998 .

[27]  M Morra,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches. , 1997, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[28]  Alexis T. Bell,et al.  Techniques and applications of plasma chemistry , 1974 .

[29]  J. Witkowski,et al.  Influence of serum on attachment of tissue cells to glass surfaces. , 1972, Experimental cell research.