Motion between the Indian, Capricorn and Somalian plates since 20 Ma: implications for the timing and magnitude of distributed lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian ocean

SUMMARY Approximately 2200 magnetic anomaly crossings and 800 fracture zone crossings flanking the Carlsberg ridge and Central Indian ridge are used to estimate the rotations of the Indian and Capricorn plates relative to the Somalian Plate for 20 distinct points in time since 20 Ma. The data are further used to place limits on the locations of the northern edge of the rigid Capricorn Plate and of the southern edge of the rigid Indian Plate along the Central Indian ridge. Data south of and including fracture zone N (the fracture zone immediately south of the Vema fracture zone), which intersects the Central Indian ridge near 10 ◦ S, are well fit assuming rigid Capricorn and Somalian plates, while data north of fracture zone N are not, in agreement with prior results. Data north of fracture zone H, which intersects the Central Indian ridge near 3.2 ◦ S, are well fit assuming rigid Indian and Somalian plates, while data south of and including fracture zone H are not, resulting in a smaller rigid Indian Plate and a wider diffuse oceanic plate boundary than found before. The data are consistent with Capricorn‐Somalia motion about a fixed pole since ≈8 Ma, but require rotation about a pole 15 ◦ farther away from the Central Indian ridge from 20 to ≈8 Ma. The post-8-Ma pole also indicates Capricorn‐ Somalia displacement directions that are 7 ◦ clockwise of those indicated by the pre-8-Ma stage pole. In contrast, India‐Somalia anomaly and fracture crossings are well fit by a single fixed pole of rotation for the past 20 Ma. India‐Somalia motion has changed little during the past 20 Myr. Nonetheless, astronomically calibrated ages for reversals younger than 12.9 Ma allow resolution of the following small but significant changes in spreading rate: India‐Somalia spreading slowed from 31 to 28 mm yr −1 near 7.9 Ma and later sped up to 31 mm yr −1 near 3.6 Ma; Capricorn‐Somalia spreading slowed from 40 to 36 mm yr −1 near 11.0 Ma, later sped up to 38 mm yr −1 near 5.1 Ma and further sped up to 40 mm yr −1 near 2.6 Ma. The motion between the Indian and Capricorn plates is estimated by differencing India‐Somalia and Capricorn‐Somalia rotations, which differ significantly for all 20 pairs of reconstructions. India has rotated relative to the Capricorn Plate since at least ≈20 Ma. If about a pole located near 4 ◦ S, 75 ◦ E, the rate of rotation was slow, 0.11 ◦ ± 0.01 ◦ Myr −1 (95 per cent confidence limits), from 20 to 8 Ma, but increased to 0.28 ◦ ± 0.01 ◦ Myr −1 (95 per cent confidence limits) at ≈8 Ma. The onset of more rapid rotation coincides, within uncertainty, with the inferred onset at 7‐8 Ma of widespread thrust faulting in the Central Indian basin, and with the hypothesized attainment of maximum elevation and initiation of collapse of the Tibetan plateau at ≈8 Ma. The plate kinematic data are consistent with steady India‐Capricorn motion since 8 Ma and provide no evidence for previously hypothesized episodic motions during that interval. The convergence since 8 Ma between the Indian and Capricorn plates significantly exceeds (by 13 to 20 km) the convergence estimated from three north‐south marine seismic profiles in the Central Indian basin. Where and how the additional convergence was accommodated is unclear.

[1]  D. G. Moore,et al.  16. STRATIGRAPHIC-SEISMIC SECTION CORRELATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS TO BENGAL FAN HISTORY , 2007 .

[2]  J. Calvo,et al.  An astronomical polarity timescale for the late middle Miocene based on cyclic continental sequences , 2003 .

[3]  J. Bull,et al.  Evidence for multiphase folding of the central Indian Ocean lithosphere , 2001 .

[4]  D. Wilson,et al.  Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis , 1999, Nature.

[5]  J. Royer,et al.  Evidence for long-term diffuse deformation of the lithosphere of the equatorial Indian Ocean , 1998, Nature.

[6]  R. Gordon THE PLATE TECTONIC APPROXIMATION: Plate Nonrigidity, Diffuse Plate Boundaries, and Global Plate Reconstructions , 1998 .

[7]  J. Royer,et al.  The Motion and Boundary Between the Capricorn and Australian Plates , 1997 .

[8]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry , 1997 .

[9]  J. Royer,et al.  New limits on the motion between India and Australia since chron 5 (11 Ma) and implications for lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian Ocean , 1997 .

[10]  Frederik J. Hilgen,et al.  Extending the astronomical ( polarity) time scale into the Miocene , 1995 .

[11]  A. Briais Structural analysis of the segmentation of the Central Indian Ridge between 20°30′S and 25°30′S (Rodriguez Triple Junction) , 1995 .

[12]  James R. Cochran,et al.  Distribution of shortening between the Indian and Australian plates in the central Indian Ocean , 1995 .

[13]  S. Cande,et al.  Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic , 1995 .

[14]  C. Demets,et al.  Location of the Africa-Australia-India Triple Junction and Motion Between the Australian and Indian Plates: Results From an Aeromagnetic Investigation of the Central Indian and Carlsberg Ridges , 1994 .

[15]  A. Gorodnitsky Anomalous Magnetic Field of the World Ocean , 1994 .

[16]  F. Jestin Cinematique rigide et deformations dans la jonction triple afar et dans le bassin indien central , 1994 .

[17]  N. Chamot-Rooke,et al.  Intraplate shortening in the central Indian Ocean determined from a 2100-km-long north-south deep seismic reflection profile , 1993 .

[18]  M. V. Ramana,et al.  Geophysical studies over a segment of the Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean , 1993 .

[19]  Peter Molnar,et al.  Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian Monsoon , 1993 .

[20]  L. Parson,et al.  Segmentation of the Central Indian Ridge between 12°12′ S and the Indian Ocean Triple Junction , 1993 .

[21]  Douglas S. Wilson Confidence intervals for motion and deformation of the Juan de Fuca Plate , 1993 .

[22]  Douglas S. Wilson,et al.  Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates , 1993, Nature.

[23]  A. Chaubey,et al.  Spreading history of the Arabian Sea: Some new constraints , 1993 .

[24]  S. Cande,et al.  A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic , 1992 .

[25]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[26]  Ted Chang,et al.  Evidence for relative motions between the Indian and Australian Plates during the last 20 m.y. from plate tectonic reconstructions: Implications for the deformation of the Indo‐Australian Plate , 1991 .

[27]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Depth to basement and geoid expression of the Kane Fracture Zone: A comparison , 1991, Marine Geophysical Researches.

[28]  J. Dyment Structure et évolution de la lithosphère océanique dans l'océan Indien : apport des anomalies magnétiques , 1991 .

[29]  C. Demets,et al.  Kinematic constraints on distributed lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian Ocean from present motion between the Australian and Indian Plates , 1990 .

[30]  Ted Chang,et al.  The rotation group in plate tectonics and the representation of uncertainties of plate reconstructions , 1990 .

[31]  A. Chaubey,et al.  Magnetic anomalies across the southern Central Indian Ridge : evidence for a new transform fault , 1990 .

[32]  J. R. Cochran Himalayan Uplift, Sea Level, and the Record of Bengal Fan Sedimentation at the ODP Leg 116 Sites , 1990 .

[33]  J. Curray,et al.  Timing of intraplate deformation, northeastern Indian Ocean , 1989 .

[34]  Ted Chang,et al.  Estimating the Relative Rotation of Two Tectonic Plates from Boundary Crossings , 1988 .

[35]  P. Molnar,et al.  The Cenozoic and Late Cretaceous evolution of the Indian Ocean Basin: uncertainties in the reconstructed positions of the Indian, African and Antarctic plates , 1988 .

[36]  P. Molnar,et al.  A method for bounding uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions , 1985 .

[37]  S. Stein,et al.  A diffuse plate boundary model for Indian Ocean tectonics , 1985 .

[38]  D. Sandwell A detailed view of the South Pacific geoid from satellite altimetry , 1984 .

[39]  Roger N. Anderson,et al.  Deformation of the Indo–Australian plate , 1980, Nature.

[40]  S. J. Hellinger The statistics of finite rotations in plate tectonics , 1979 .

[41]  A. Cox,et al.  Absolute motion of an individual plate estimated from its ridge and trench boundaries , 1978, Nature.

[42]  R. Parker,et al.  An Analysis of Near‐Bottom Magnetic Anomalies: Sea‐Floor Spreading and the Magnetized Layer , 1975 .

[43]  J. Mudie,et al.  Detailed near-bottom geophysical study of the Gorda Rise , 1973 .

[44]  Hans Schouten,et al.  Filtering marine magnetic anomalies , 1972 .

[45]  J. Ewing,et al.  Mid‐plate tectonics in the Indian Ocean , 1972 .

[46]  D. McKenzie,et al.  Evolution of the Central Indian Ridge, Western Indian Ocean , 1971 .

[47]  J. Zijderveld A. C. Demagnetization of Rocks: Analysis of Results , 1967 .