Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Suspected Ovarian Malignancy: A Survey of Perioperative Practice Among Gynecologic Oncologists in Australia and New Zealand to Inform a Clinical Trial

Objectives The objective of this survey was to review the current standard of perioperative care of patients with suspected advanced ovarian cancer in Australia and New Zealand in order to determine the level of equipoise for specific interventions. Methods In May 2016, a web-based questionnaire (SurveyMonkey Inc, Palo Alto, CA) was sent to all gynecologic oncologists in Australia and New Zealand (n = 56). Descriptive statistics were used. Results Response rate was 75%. Prevention of hypothermia, extended thromboembolic prophylaxis, antibiotic prophylaxis, and the avoidance of the routine use of drains were standard of care. Bowel preparation was given by 10% routinely and by 35% when bowel resection was planned. Fasting times for fluids of six hours or more were common (55%). Only 26% had shortened fasting times of two hours. Twelve percent used carbohydrate loading. The majority of patients started a light diet within the first postoperative day and advanced diet subsequently as tolerated. Six respondents (15%) used thoracic epidural, whereas the majority (73%) administered an opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia as the predominant postoperative analgesia, mainly as part of a multimodal pain management. The majority of respondents expressed an interest in a trial concept of individual ERAS interventions. Conclusions Only a minority of ERAS interventions can be considered standard of care in ovarian cancer surgery. The existing level of equipoise among gynecologic oncologists in Australia and New Zealand, and their interest in a trial concept of individual ERAS interventions allows further assessment of the feasibility and efficacy of interventions in a randomized controlled trial.

[1]  J. Sehouli,et al.  Diaphragmatic Surgery in Advanced Ovarian, Tubal and Peritoneal Cancer. A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network. , 2016, Anticancer research.

[2]  R. Kimmig,et al.  Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways in Gynecologic Oncology. A NOGGO-AGO* survey of 144 Gynecological Departments in Germany. , 2016, Anticancer research.

[3]  H. Körner,et al.  Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery criteria and preoperative and postoperative counselling reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial , 2016, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations — Part II , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Guidelines for pre-and intraoperative care in gynecologic / oncology surgery : Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ® ) Society recommendations — Part , 2015 .

[6]  Mark Rockley,et al.  Current perioperative practice in Canadian vascular surgery. , 2015, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[7]  C. Dejong,et al.  Diffusion of Enhanced Recovery principles in gynecologic oncology surgery: is active implementation still necessary? , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  M. Braga,et al.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a survey among anaesthesiologists from 27 countries. , 2014, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[9]  K. Fearon,et al.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colonic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (eras Clinical Nutrition , 2022 .

[10]  M. Gatt,et al.  Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  S. Post,et al.  Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany , 2010, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[12]  Gang Shi,et al.  Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  V. Seshan,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia to Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control and Recovery After Major Open Gynecologic Cancer Surgery , 2009 .

[14]  Emily McFarlane,et al.  Conducting Survey Research among Physicians and other Medical Professionals - A Review of Current Literature , 2008 .

[15]  K. Lassen,et al.  Patterns in current anaesthesiological peri‐operative practice for colonic resections: a survey in five northern‐European countries , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[16]  M. Büchler,et al.  Care after colonic operation--is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[17]  K. Lassen,et al.  Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Y. Mintz,et al.  Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[19]  F. Pott,et al.  Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Henrik Kehlet,et al.  Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery , 2003, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Lobo,et al.  Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[22]  lexander,et al.  Duration of Prophylaxis against Venous Thromboembolism with Enoxaparin after Surgery for Cancer , 2002 .