What is ‘the real thing’ in the museum? An interpretative phenomenological study

This article describes a study of the different ways museum visitors understand their experience of the real thing (TRT) in the museum context. Many professionals and scholars claim that the uniqueness of the museum – in relation to other leisure and educational experiences and offerings – centers on being the keepers of ‘real things.’ Having an insight into the visitor perspectives of what they consider real is important and relevant to museum professionals as well as other cultural heritage workers as it can assist them to better respond to visitor experiences of TRT. The study used an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach to inquire into the qualitatively different ways of understanding the experience of TRT in the museum. The research resulted in four ways of understanding an experience of TRT in museums: through aspects of the self, in relation to others, through the presence of the actual physical thing, and through one's surroundings.

[1]  Paulette M. McManus,et al.  Memories as indicators of the impact of museum visits , 1993 .

[2]  Jan Packer,et al.  Beyond Learning: Exploring Visitors' Perceptions of the Value and Benefits of Museum Experiences , 2008 .

[3]  François Mairesse,et al.  Key concepts of museology , 2010 .

[4]  Peter Bjerregaard,et al.  Museum Materialities: Objects, Engagements, Interpretations , 2011 .

[5]  Sandra H. Dudley Museum Objects: Experiencing the Properties of Things , 2012 .

[6]  Helen J. Chatterjee,et al.  Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling , 2008 .

[7]  I. Hodder Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things , 2012 .

[8]  Kiersten F. Latham,et al.  Object Knowledge: Researching Objects in the Museum Experience , 2009 .

[9]  Lisa F. Smith,et al.  The Influence of Presentation Format and Viewer Training in the Visual Arts on the Perception of Pictorial and Aesthetic Qualities of Paintings , 2001, Perception.

[10]  Zahava D. Doering,et al.  Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums , 1999 .

[11]  Paul A. Bell,et al.  The Influence of Museum Exhibit Design on Immersion and Psychological Flow , 1998 .

[12]  Miles Orvell,et al.  The Real Thing: Imitation and Authenticity in American Culture, 1880-1940. , 1989 .

[13]  Mattias Arvola,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological , 2017 .

[14]  Jay Rounds,et al.  Doing Identity Work in Museums , 2006 .

[15]  R. Forrest,et al.  Museum Atmospherics: The Role of the Exhibition Environment in the Visitor Experience , 2013 .

[16]  L. Froggett,et al.  Object relations in the museum: a psychosocial perspective , 2014 .

[17]  Mazin B. Qumsiyeh,et al.  Foundations of museum studies: evolving systems of knowledge , 2016 .

[18]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Perception and evaluation of authentic objects: findings from a visitor study , 2014 .

[19]  P. Bjerregaard Dissolving objects: Museums, atmosphere and the creation of presence , 2015 .

[20]  Lois H. Silverman Visitor Meaning‐Making in Museums for a New Age , 1995 .

[21]  Niels Windfeld Lund,et al.  Document, documentation, and the Document Academy: introduction , 2008 .

[22]  A. Pekarik,et al.  Ideas, Objects, or People? A Smithsonian Exhibition Team Views Visitors Anew , 2010 .

[23]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[24]  J. H. Gilmore,et al.  Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want , 2007 .

[25]  Christine Reich A Review of “Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling” , 2010 .