Calcium Antagonist Lacidipine Slows Down Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis: Principal Results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Trial

Background—Most cardiovascular events associated with hypertension are complications of atherosclerosis. Some antihypertensive agents influence experimental models of atherosclerosis through mechanisms independent of blood pressure lowering. Methods and Results—The European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) was a randomized, double-blind trial in 2334 patients with hypertension that compared the effects of a 4-year treatment based on either lacidipine or atenolol on an index of carotid atherosclerosis, the mean of the maximum intima-media thicknesses (IMT) in far walls of common carotids and bifurcations (CBMmax). This index has been shown by epidemiological studies to be predictive of cardiovascular events. A significant (P <0.0001) effect of lacidipine was found compared with atenolol, with a treatment difference in 4-year CBMmax progression of −0.0227 mm (intention-to-treat population) and −0.0281 mm (completers). The yearly IMT progression rate was 0.0145 mm/y in atenolol-treated and 0.0087 mm/y in lacidipine-treated patients (completers, 40% reduction;P =0.0073). Patients with plaque progression were significantly less common, and patients with plaque regression were significantly more common in the lacidipine group. Clinic blood pressure reductions were identical with both treatments, but 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure changes were greater with atenolol (−10/−9 mm Hg) than with lacidipine (−7/−5 mm Hg). No significant difference between treatments was found in any cardiovascular events, although the relative risk for stroke, major cardiovascular events, and mortality showed a trend favoring lacidipine. Conclusion—The greater efficacy of lacidipine on carotid IMT progression and number of plaques per patient, despite a smaller ambulatory blood pressure reduction, indicates an antiatherosclerotic action of lacidipine independent of its antihypertensive action.

[1]  A. Zanchetti The antiatherogenic effects of antihypertensive treatment: Trials completed and ongoing , 2001, Current hypertension reports.

[2]  L. Ghiadoni,et al.  Effect of calcium antagonist or beta blockade treatment on nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation and oxidative stress in essential hypertensive patients , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[3]  A. Simon,et al.  Differential Effects of Nifedipine and Co-Amilozide on the Progression of Early Carotid Wall Changes , 2001, Circulation.

[4]  G. Berglund,et al.  Low-Dose Metoprolol CR/XL and Fluvastatin Slow Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: Main Results From the &bgr;-Blocker Cholesterol-Lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS) , 2001, Circulation.

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of Ramipril and Vitamin E on Atherosclerosis: The Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound Changes in Patients Treated With Ramipril and Vitamin E (SECURE) , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  C. Zancanaro,et al.  The calcium‐channel blocker lacidipine reduces the development of atherosclerotic lesions in the apoE‐deficient mouse , 2000, Journal of hypertension.

[7]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Effect of Amlodipine on the Progression of Atherosclerosis and the Occurrence of Clinical Events , 2000, Circulation.

[8]  John S. Scott,et al.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive arterial disease. PART-2 Collaborative Research Group. Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Folsom,et al.  Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  A. Zanchetti,et al.  Baseline reproducibility of B‐mode ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima – media thickness: the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) , 2000, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  G. Gaviraghi,et al.  Comparative effects of different dihydropyridines on the expression of adhesion molecules induced by TNF-alpha on endothelial cells. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Gaviraghi,et al.  Oxidized low‐density lipoprotein increases the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species in endothelial cells: inhibitory effect of lacidipine , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[14]  A. Zanchetti,et al.  The Verapamil in Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study (VHAS): Results of long‐term randomized treatment with either verapamil or chlorthalidone on carotid intima‐media thickness , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima—media thickness in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[16]  R H Selzer,et al.  The Role of Carotid Arterial Intima-Media Thickness in Predicting Clinical Coronary Events , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Arno W. Hoes,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. , 1997, Circulation.

[18]  M. Rocco,et al.  Final outcome results of the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS). A randomized controlled trial. , 1996, JAMA.

[19]  E. Donetti,et al.  Effect of lacidipine on fatty and proliferative lesions induced in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits , 1996, British journal of pharmacology.

[20]  J. Salonen,et al.  Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression. , 1993, Circulation.

[21]  A. Zanchetti The antiatherogenic effects of antihypertensive drugs: experimental and clinical evidence. , 1992, Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice.

[22]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.