Correction of Sagittal Synostosis Using Foreshortening and Lateral Expansion of the Cranium Activated by Gravity: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Evolution

Background: The authors present a technique for correction of sagittal synostosis addressing the transverse constriction and providing foreshortening of the skull without the use of hardware. The design of the osteotomies combined with strict postoperative supine positioning allows foreshortening of the skull, with concomitant expansion. Methods: Twenty-two patients were operated on using the foreshortening and lateral expansion activated by gravity technique. Postoperative follow-up included clinical evaluation and three-dimensional computed tomographic scanning at 4 to 6 weeks, 1 year, and yearly afterward. These scans were analyzed using three-dimensional surface analysis software, according to a protocol the authors describe in this article. Results: The cephalic index improved from 66.4 preoperatively to 74.5 at 1 year postoperatively (normal, 72 to 87). Transverse growth continued to be the dominant vector of growth up to 1 year (until ossification-bridging of the vertex craniectomy). Beyond 1 year, the main area of transverse growth was overlying the temporal suture, producing a distinctive temporal bossing in patients. The parietal areas showed mini-mal growth afterward. Growth was mainly occipital between 1 and 3 years of age, and frontal afterward, up to 5 years of age. A low frontal bossing also occurred in some of our patients and resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: The authors have described a technique for correction of scaphocephaly that avoids the use of hardware, with acceptable operative times and transfusion needs. Postoperative improvement in shape is satisfactory. Analysis of the three-dimensional scans of these patients shows abnormal skull growth patterns up to 5 years of age.

[1]  M W Vannier,et al.  The Craniofacial Anomalies Archive at St. Louis Children's Hospital: 20 Years of Craniofacial Imaging Experience , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  L. David,et al.  SPRING-MEDIATED CRANIOPLASTY COMPARED WITH THE MODIFIED PI-PLASTY FOR SAGITTAL SYNOSTOSIS , 2003, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[3]  J T Richtsmeier,et al.  Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth. , 1986, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[4]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[5]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brainstem arteriovenous malformations: factors affecting outcome. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Hung span method of scaphocephaly reconstruction in patients with elevated intracranial pressure. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  D. Jimenez,et al.  Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  C. H. Paik,et al.  Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. , 1995, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  Photographic assessment of head shape following sagittal synostosis surgery. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  C J Valeri,et al.  Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  J Ghafari,et al.  Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. , 2002, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[12]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Sagittal craniosynostosis outcome assessment for two methods and timings of intervention. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  D. Hemmy,et al.  Clinical Outcome of the Modified Pi-Plasty Procedure for Sagittal Synostosis , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.