Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects

While Foucault described population as the object of biopower he did not investigate the practices that make it possible to know population. Rather, he tended to overemphasize it as an object on which power can act. However, population is not an object awaiting discovery, but is represented and enacted by specific devices such as censuses and what I call population metrics. The latter enact populations by assembling different categories and measurements of subjects (biographical, biometric and transactional) in myriad ways to identify and measure the performance of populations. I account for both the object and subject by thinking about how devices consist of agencements; that is, specific arrangements of humans and technologies whose mediations and interactions not only enact populations but also produce subjects. I suggest that population metrics render subjects interpassive whereby other beings or objects take up the role and act in place of the subject.

[1]  David Lyon,et al.  Playing the identity card : surveillance, security and identification in global perspective , 2013 .

[2]  G. Oenen.  Interpassive Agency: Engaging Actor-Network-Theory's View on the Agency of Objects , 2011 .

[3]  Michael Kaplan.  The Producing Population , 2009 .

[4]  Mike Savage,et al.  Contemporary Sociology and the Challenge of Descriptive Assemblage , 2009 .

[5]  Louise Amoore,et al.  Lines of sight: on the visualization of unknown futures , 2009 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  On Sociology and STS , 2008 .

[7]  Torin Monahan,et al.  Crime in an Insecure World , 2008 .

[8]  ‘I Is; Therefore I Am’: The Census as Practice of Double Identification , 2008 .

[9]  Luis Lobo-Guerrero,et al.  Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: an introduction , 2008, Review of International Studies.

[10]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[11]  E. Ruppert.  "I is; therefore I am”: The Census as Narrative and Practice of Double Identification , 2008 .

[12]  Mireille Hildebrandt,et al.  Defining Profiling: A New Type of Knowledge? , 2008, Profiling the European Citizen.

[13]  James Backhouse,et al.  General Description of the Process of Behavioural Profiling , 2008, Profiling the European Citizen.

[14]  M. Foucault.  The Birth of Biopolitics , 2008 .

[15]  S Gibbon,et al.  ‘Introduction’ to Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences; making biologies and identities , 2007 .

[16]  Families..  Department for Children, Schools and Families , 2007 .

[17]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Assembling an Economic Actor: The Agencement of a Hedge Fund , 2007 .

[18]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[19]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[20]  G. Marx.  Hey Buddy can you spare a DNA? New surveillance technologies and the growth of mandatory volunteerism in collecting personal information. , 2007, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[21]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[22]  Peter Elias,et al.  Administrative data as a research resource: a selected audit , 2006 .

[23]  G. Oenen.  A Machine That Would Go of Itself: Interpassivity and Its Impact on Political Life , 2006 .

[24]  Louise Amoore,et al.  Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror , 2006 .

[25]  David Lyon,et al.  Theorizing surveillance : the panopticon and beyond , 2006 .

[26]  Catarina Fróis,et al.  Documenting individual identity: the development of state practices in the modern world , 2006 .

[27]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Codes of Life: Identification Codes and the Machine-Readable World , 2004 .

[28]  Perri,et al.  Joined‐up government and privacy in the United Kingdom: managing tensions between data protection and social policy. Part II , 2005 .

[29]  Toni Weller,et al.  The Information State in England: The Central Collection of Information on Citizens Since 1500 , 2005, J. Documentation.

[30]  S MariaNaVaLvErdeandMichaelMOPa.  Insecurity and the dream of targeted governance , 2004 .

[31]  David Murakami Wood,et al.  Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality , 2003 .

[32]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[33]  B. Curtis.  Foucault on Governmentality and Population: The Impossible Discovery * , 2002 .

[34]  Sean P. Hier.  Probing the Surveillant Assemblage: on the dialectics of surveillance practices as processes of social control. , 2002 .

[35]  B. Cruikshank.  Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world. , 2002 .

[36]  D. Kertzer,et al.  Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses , 2001 .

[37]  D. Kertzer,et al.  Census and Identity: Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power , 2001 .

[38]  James R. Barker,et al.  Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[39]  Angel J. Gordo-Lpez,et al.  Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood , 2000 .

[40]  R. Ericson,et al.  The surveillant assemblage. , 2000, The British journal of sociology.

[41]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[42]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[43]  T. Mathiesen,et al.  The Viewer Society , 1997 .

[44]  M. Foucault,et al.  Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth , 1997 .

[45]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Information technology and dataveillance , 1988, CACM.

[46]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. , 1985 .

[47]  M. Foucault.  The Subject and Power , 1982, Critical Inquiry.

[48]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .