Alcohol Fueled Heavy Duty Vehicles Using Clean, High Efficiency Engines

Ethanol and methanol derived from a variety of sources could make a substantial contribution to replacing oil-derived transportation fuels and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Particularly important are next generation, low carbon biofuels derived from agricultural, forestry, municipal and industrial waste by biochemical or thermochemical processes including plasma gasification, as well as specially grown biomass such as switchgrass. Ethanol, methanol or mixtures of these fuels can be used in turbocharged direct injection spark ignition engines which are as or more efficient than diesel engines and also provide advantages of lower cost, lower emissions and higher power. The strong knock suppression resulting from direct alcohol injection enables engine operation with power densities of up to three times that which can be provided by diesel engines. A representative power density is 200 hp/liter. The introduction of these engines in heavy duty vehicles could be relatively rapid because of the need to replace present heavy duty diesel engines in order to meet more stringent air pollution regulations and relatively modest fueling infrastructure requirements. During the initial market introduction phase the fuel could be presently produced ethanol. In addition, these engines could be operated as flexible fuel engines to allow use of gasoline as the main fuel when alcohol fuel is not available or it is more economically attractive to use gasoline. The flexible fuel engines could use a secondary tank of independently controlled direct ethanol injection to prevent knock and allow operation primarily on gasoline without compromising performance. Depending on the application the amount of alcohol from this second tank would be around 15-20 % of gasoline use for prolonged high torque operation long haul trucks with gasoline alone in the main tank. It would be less than 3% for a typical non long haul truck operation drive cycle. The high power density turbocharged operation enabled by the knock suppression from direct alcohol injection could allow super engine downsizing where, for example, a 5 liter spark ignition engine could be used to provide the same power as a diesel engine with an 11 liter displacement and possibly a 15 liter diesel engine. High power density, alcohol fueled heavy-duty vehicle engines could be used for both long and short haul trucks, buses and off road vehicles. Dedicated ethanol operation could be particularly attractive for farm vehicles. High power density alcohol fueled engines can also be attractive for light duty vehicles.

[1]  Matthew J. Brusstar,et al.  High Efficiency with Future Alcohol Fuels in a Stoichiometric Medium Duty Spark Ignition Engine , 2007 .

[2]  L. Bromberg,et al.  Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions , 2005 .

[3]  Addison K. Stark,et al.  Multi-criteria lifecycle evaluation of transportation fuels derived from biomass gasification , 2010 .

[4]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[5]  Tiffany Amber Groode,et al.  Biomass to ethanol : potential production and environmental impacts , 2008 .

[6]  Richard Pearson,et al.  Extending the Supply of Alcohol Fuels for Energy Security and Carbon Reduction , 2009 .

[7]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Lean-burn characteristics of a gasoline engine enriched with hydrogen from a plasmatron fuel reformer , 2003 .

[8]  L. Bromberg,et al.  Estimates of DI Hydrous Ethanol Utilization for Knock Avoidance and Comparison to a Measured and Simulated DI E85 Baseline , 2010 .

[9]  L. Bromberg,et al.  Effective Octane And Efficiency Advantages Of Direct Injection Alcohol Engines , 2008 .

[10]  W. Cheng,et al.  A New Approach to Ethanol Utilization: High Efficiency and Low NOx in an Engine Operating on Simulated Reformed Ethanol , 2008 .

[11]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H2 and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept , 2004 .

[12]  R. Chiriac,et al.  A Study of Combustion of Hydrogen-Enriched Gasoline in a Spark Ignition Engine , 1996 .

[13]  C. Westbrook,et al.  A Comprehensive Modeling Study of iso-Octane Oxidation , 2002 .

[14]  N. Marinov,et al.  A detailed chemical kinetic model for high temperature ethanol oxidation , 1999 .

[15]  Robert Albert Stein,et al.  Optimal Use of E85 in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Engine , 2009 .

[16]  Roberta J. Nichols,et al.  The Methanol Story: A Sustainable Fuel for the Future , 2003 .

[17]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[18]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Improving Fuel Economy for HD Diesel Engines with WHR Rankine Cycle Driven by EGR Cooler Heat Rejection , 2009 .

[19]  Effect of Compression Ratio and Manifold Pressure on Ethanol Utilizationin Gasoline/Ethanol Engines , 2007 .

[20]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Calculations Of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection , 2006 .

[21]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Emissions Reductions Using Hydrogen from Plasmatron Fuel Converters , 2000 .

[22]  Chun Tai,et al.  Simulation of High Efficiency Heavy Duty SI Engines Using Direct Injection of Alcohol for Knock Avoidance , 2008 .

[23]  John Pavlus The Power of Garbage , 2009 .

[24]  James Turner,et al.  Alcohol-based fuels in high performance engines , 2007 .