Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography

Masked priming is used in psycholinguistic studies to assess questions about lexical access and representation. We present two masked priming experiments using MEG. If the MEG signal elicited by words reflects specific aspects of lexical retrieval, then one expects to identify specific neural correlates of retrieval that are sensitive to priming. To date, the electrophysiological evidence has been equivocal. We report findings from two experiments. Both employed identity priming, where the prime and target are the same lexical item but differ in case (NEWS-news). The first experiment used only forward masking, while the prime in the second experiment was both preceded and followed by a mask (backward masking). In both studies, we find a significant behavioral effect of priming. Using MEG, we identified a component peaking approximately 225 ms post-onset of the target, whose latency was sensitive to repetition. These findings support the notion that properties of the MEG response index specific lexical processes and demonstrate that masked priming can be effectively combined with MEG to investigate the nature of lexical processing.

[1]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical Effects of Shifting Letter Position in Letter Strings of Varying Length , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Visual word recognition: the first half second , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study , 2000 .

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked repetition priming and word frequency effects across different types of Japanese scripts: An examination of the lexical activation account , 2003 .

[8]  J. Grainger,et al.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  ERP Evidence of Morphological Analysis from Orthography: A Masked Priming Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  K. Forster,et al.  The mechanics of masked priming , 2003 .

[11]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early influences of word length and frequency: a group study using MEG , 2003, Neuroreport.

[12]  Sachiko Koyama,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Repetition on Cortical Magnetic Responses Evoked by Words and Nonwords , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alec Marantz,et al.  A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence , 2006 .

[14]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[15]  David Poeppel,et al.  Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .

[16]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[17]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[18]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  R. Kakigi,et al.  The effect of word repetition on evoked magnetic responses in the human brain , 2000 .

[21]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study , 2004, Cognition.

[23]  Michael E. J. Masson,et al.  A Retrospective View of Masked Priming : Toward a Unified Account of Masked and Long-Term Repetition Priming , 2003 .

[24]  K. Forster.  The Microgenesis of Priming Effects in Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[25]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[26]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods 165 (2007) 297–305 Denoising based on time-shift PCA , 2007 .

[28]  A. Marantz,et al.  A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  R. Holloway.  The broth in my brother ’ s brothel : Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2005 .

[30]  Alec Marantz,et al.  The precise time course of lexical activation: MEG measurements of the effects of frequency, probability, and density in lexical decision , 2004, Brain and Language.

[31]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[32]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[33]  David Poeppel,et al.  The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.