Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator

Recent research advanced a causal model explaining the teacher immediacy/student learning relationship by positing the mediational effects of students' state motivation to learn. This study argued instead for an alternative model which posits that affective learning, not state motivation, is the central causal mediator between teacher immediacy and students' cognitive learning. To test this causal model, students (N = 224) were asked to evaluate the instructors of their class meeting immediately after the course where they completed the questionnaires. These surveys included measures of teachers' nonverbal immediacy, students' state motivation to learn, and affective and cognitive learning. Path analytic tests of both models indicated that the Affective Learning Model provided the better theoretical explanation for the relationship between immediacy and cognitive learning.

[1]  P. Kearney,et al.  Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes , 1985 .

[2]  J. Gorham,et al.  A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product , 1990 .

[3]  A. Mehrabian Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior , 1968 .

[4]  Richard W. Morshead Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[5]  V. Richmond Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation , 1990 .

[6]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[7]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[8]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[9]  R. Wiseman,et al.  The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom , 1990 .

[10]  J. Brophy,et al.  Conceptualizing student motivation , 1983 .

[11]  A. Mehrabian Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes , 1971 .

[12]  Robert A. Stewart,et al.  Communication apprehension and motivation as predictors of public speaking duration , 1986 .

[13]  Albert Mehbabian Orientation behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. , 1967 .

[14]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Causal modeling in communication research: Use, disuse, and misuse , 1987 .

[15]  J. Gorham The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[16]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1986 .

[17]  A. Mehrabian Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. , 1968, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  J. F. Andersen Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .

[19]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning , 1987 .

[20]  E. Berscheid Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. 2nd ed , 1981 .

[21]  Robert G. Powell,et al.  The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment , 1990 .

[22]  Diane M. Christophel The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[23]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  A test‐retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes , 1995 .

[24]  J. B. Pearson,et al.  Methodology in Social Research. , 1968 .

[25]  J. Gorham,et al.  Effects of immediacy on recall of information , 1988 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and causality , 1979 .

[27]  H. Sypher,et al.  Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier A model of immediacy in the classroom , 1994 .

[29]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning , 1981 .