The eye-complaint questionnaire in a visual display unit work environment: Internal consistency and test–retest reliability

The internal consistency and test–retest reliability of a 10-item eye-complaint questionnaire (ECQ) were examined within a sample of office workers. Repeated within-subjects measures were performed within a single day and over intervals of 1 and 7 d. Questionnaires were completed by 96 workers (70% female, mean age 36.4 years) who perform more than 4 h of visual display unit work each day. The internal consistency of the ECQ was high (α = 0.801). Although test–retest reliability was low within a single day (morning and afternoon) (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.68, 95% CI 0.38, 0.82), it was good between two morning measurements over a 1-d interval (ICC = 0.91 95% CI 0.87, 0.94) and between morning measurements with a 7-d interval (ICC = 0.87, 95% CI 0.81, 0.92). The ICC between afternoon measurements over a 1-week interval was moderate (ICC = 0.78, 95% CI 0.66, 0.85). This questionnaire is a reliable and consistent instrument for easily assessing eye complaints in office work. The timing of the measurements must be kept in consideration since measurements are confounded by exposures over the day.

[1]  B L Cole,et al.  Effect of VDUs on the Eyes: Report of a 6-Year Epidemiological Study , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Leon Straker,et al.  Reliability of work-related assessments. , 1999, Work.

[3]  B. Forster,et al.  Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: influence of viewing variables on symptoms. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  H Kylian,et al.  A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[5]  C. Blehm,et al.  Computer vision syndrome: a review. , 2005, Survey of ophthalmology.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  Vincent Gouttebarge,et al.  Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[8]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[9]  Thomson Wd,et al.  Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies , 1998 .

[10]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[11]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  U O Bergqvist,et al.  Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  Phillip Rumrill,et al.  Reliability in rehabilitation measurement. , 2001, Work.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[16]  Marshall Godwin,et al.  Health measurement scales , 1991 .

[17]  W D Thomson,et al.  Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  H. Emurian,et al.  Reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a video display unit , 1995 .

[19]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[20]  K N Lohr,et al.  Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. , 1996, Clinical therapeutics.