Outcome in dogs with presumptive idiopathic pericardial effusion after thoracoscopic pericardectomy and pericardioscopy.

OBJECTIVE To report the outcome of dogs with presumptive echocardiographic idiopathic pericardial effusion treated with thoracoscopic pericardectomy and pericardioscopy. STUDY DESIGN Multi-institutional retrospective study (2011-2017). ANIMALS Eighteen dogs. METHODS Records were searched for dogs with pericardial effusion and no identified cause by preoperative echocardiography and subsequent thoracoscopic pericardectomy and pericardioscopy. Collected data included presenting complaint, physical examination, laboratory results, imaging, and operative findings. Follow-up was obtained via telephone interview and/or recheck examination. RESULTS No evidence of mass lesions or cause for the effusion was identified in any of the dogs by preoperative echocardiography. Nine dogs had unremarkable pericardioscopic examination results. Nine dogs had pericardioscopic abnormalities consistent with masses, nodules, or adhesions. Median survival time (MST) for the 9 dogs with abnormalities identified by pericardioscopy was 66 days, whereas MST for the 9 dogs with unremarkable pericardioscopic examination results was not reached (P = .0067). Median survival time for dogs based on histopathologic diagnosis alone was not different between dogs with a diagnosis of neoplasia and dogs with a diagnosis of pericarditis (P = .1056). Among dogs with lesions identified during pericardioscopy, MST did not differ between those with a diagnosis of malignancy and those with a diagnosis of pericarditis (P = .78). CONCLUSION Dogs with presumptive idiopathic pericardial effusion without evidence of masses, nodules, and/or adhesions during thoracoscopic pericardectomy and pericardioscopy lived longer than dogs in which abnormalities were identified during pericardioscopy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Thoracoscopic pericardectomy/pericardioscopy and targeted biopsy of the pericardium and pleura are recommended in dogs with echocardiographic idiopathic pericardial effusion.

[1]  S. Nemanic,et al.  Use of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Dogs with Pericardial Effusion , 2014, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[2]  J. B. Case,et al.  Pericardioscopic imaging findings in cadaveric dogs: comparison of an apical pericardial window and sub-phrenic pericardectomy. , 2014, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[3]  J. B. Case,et al.  Outcome evaluation of a thoracoscopic pericardial window procedure or subtotal pericardectomy via thoracotomy for the treatment of pericardial effusion in dogs. , 2013, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[4]  H. Litt,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance in the differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic pericardial effusion. , 2011, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[5]  C. Rawlings,et al.  Thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation and thoracoscopic pericardectomy for treatment of chylothorax in dogs. , 2010, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[6]  K. Macdonald,et al.  Echocardiographic and clinicopathologic characterization of pericardial effusion in dogs: 107 cases (1985-2006). , 2009, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[7]  P. Mayhew,et al.  Thoracoscopic subphrenic pericardectomy using double-lumen endobronchial intubation for alternating one-lung ventilation. , 2009, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  K. Mitsumori,et al.  Development of pericardial mesothelioma in golden retrievers with a long-term history of idiopathic haemorrhagic pericardial effusion. , 2004, Journal of Comparative Pathology.

[9]  B. Bouvy,et al.  Thoracoscopic pericardectomy performed without pulmonary exclusion in 9 dogs. , 2001, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[10]  J. Jackson,et al.  Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy in 13 dogs. , 1999, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[11]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Surgical treatment of idiopathic pericardial effusion in the dog: 25 cases (1978-1993). , 1999, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[12]  S. Cantwell,et al.  Thoracoscopic versus open partial pericardectomy in dogs: comparison of postoperative pain and morbidity. , 1999, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[13]  E. Monnet,et al.  Analysis of prognostic indicators for dogs with pericardial effusion: 46 cases (1985-1996). , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[14]  P. De Groote,et al.  Pericardioscopy in the etiologic diagnosis of pericardial effusion in 141 consecutive patients. , 1996, Circulation.

[15]  P. De Groote,et al.  Malignant pericardial effusions: usefulness of pericardioscopy. , 1992, American heart journal.

[16]  A. Li,et al.  Use of a flexible choledochoscope for pericardioscopy and drainage of a loculated pericardial effusion. , 1987, Thorax.

[17]  G. Kondos,et al.  Flexible fiberoptic pericardioscopy for the diagnosis of pericardial disease. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  A. Little,et al.  Pericardioscopy as adjunct to pericardial window. , 1986, Chest.