The Role of External Embeddedness and Knowledge Management as Antecedents of Ambidexterity and Performances in Italian SMEs

Sourcing and leveraging knowledge from an external network is only half the battle for firms that would become more successful. In fact, the mere access and acquisition of the knowledge itself through embedded ties does not secure to perform exploration and exploitation activities, and consequently, to achieve better performance because knowledge has to be managed. Firms' knowledge management (KM) orientation may help in the process of knowledge acquisition, sharing, and transfer, consequently, improving firms' ambidexterity and competitiveness. Thus, this paper proposes that the KM plays a key role in determining the outcomes of firm's external embeddedness, i.e., the characteristics and ties of the external network, on the ambidexterity and performances of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). An empirical analysis has been developed by using structural equations modeling with data collected from CEOs in 119 Italian SMEs in the ceramic tile industry. Findings show that the KM plays a significant role in mediating the effects of the external embeddedness on the firm's ambidexterity that in turn enhances the performances of Italian SMEs in our sample. Based on our results, implications for academics and managers and future line of research are proposed.

[1]  Mamoun N. Akroush,et al.  New product development performance success measures: an exploratory research , 2016 .

[2]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[3]  Peter Moran Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[4]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[6]  Demetris Vrontis,et al.  Building Multiunit Ambidextrous Organizations—A Transformative Framework , 2015 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[8]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  New ICTs for Knowledge Management in Organizations , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Jifeng Mu,et al.  Networking Capability and New Product Development , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[12]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Knowledge Mangement in Pursuit of Performance: Insights from Nortel Networks , 2002, MIS Q..

[13]  Marina du Plessis,et al.  The role of knowledge management in innovation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs1 , 2007 .

[15]  Zhijian Cui,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Framework of Innovation Strategy: The Differential Effect of Knowledge Sources , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[17]  M. Terziovski,et al.  Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance , 2004 .

[18]  A. García-Pérez,et al.  Building affective commitment in a financial institution through an ambidexterity context , 2018 .

[19]  E. Carayannis Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management , 1999 .

[20]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  The Agile Innovation Pendulum: Family Business Innovation and the Human, Social, and Marketing Capitals , 2018 .

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  David J. Skyrme Capitalizing on Knowledge: From E-Commerce to K-Commerce , 2001 .

[23]  Hsing-Er Lin,et al.  Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  N. Azad,et al.  The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance , 2015 .

[25]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[26]  A. Ferraris,et al.  Innovation-receiving subsidiaries and dual embeddedness: impact on business performance , 2016 .

[27]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[28]  A. Spadavecchia Managing the embedded multinational: a business network view , 2009 .

[29]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[30]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  S. Snell,et al.  Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management , 2009 .

[32]  Stefano Bresciani Innovation within firms: a survey in the Piedmont area , 2010 .

[33]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[34]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability , 2003 .

[35]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  The impact of IT-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: a structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  É. Davoine,et al.  Transferring codes of conduct within a multinational firm: The case of Lebanon , 2012 .

[37]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[38]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Knowledge and the Family Business: The Governance and Management of Family Firms in the New Knowledge Economy , 2010 .

[39]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[40]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  International diversification and firm performance: a four-stage model , 2016 .

[41]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  Determinants of Knowledge Management Assimilation: An Empirical Investigation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[43]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[44]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  How to Balance Sustainability and Profitability in Technology Organizations: An Ambidextrous Perspective , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[45]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[46]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms , 2017 .

[47]  B. Davies,et al.  Performance of SMEs in Tangier: the interface of networking and wasta , 2018 .

[48]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  The Competitiveness of the Italian Manufacturing Industry: an Attempt of Measurement , 2018 .

[49]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[51]  Yaakov Weber,et al.  Strategic Agility: A State of the Art Introduction to the Special Section on Strategic Agility , 2014 .

[52]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[54]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How MNC's subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  E. Carayannis,et al.  The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond , 2014 .

[56]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[57]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[58]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry , 2013 .

[59]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Strategic reflexivity in the hotel industry - a value-based analysis , 2014 .

[60]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[61]  David Herlihy,et al.  The Great Transformation ? , 2007 .

[62]  P. N. Figueiredo,et al.  The Role of Dual Embeddedness in the Innovative Performance of MNE Subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil , 2011 .

[63]  M. Giudice,et al.  Collective Knowledge and Organizational Routines within Academic Communities of Practice: an Empirical Research on Science–Entrepreneurs , 2013 .

[64]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Internal Embeddedness, Headquarters Involvement, and Innovation Importance in Multinational Enterprises , 2011 .

[65]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[66]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Open innovation in multinational companies' subsidiaries: the role of internal and external knowledge , 2017 .

[67]  A. Ferraris,et al.  The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[68]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[69]  Fakhraddin Maroofi,et al.  STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE , 2013 .

[70]  J. Darroch,et al.  Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation , 2002 .

[71]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[72]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs , 2017 .

[73]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[74]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[75]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  Some Results on the Behavior of Alternate Covariance Structure Estimation Procedures in the Presence of Non-Normal Data , 1989 .

[76]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[77]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Ambidexterity and the evolution of knowledge management initiatives , 2012 .

[78]  J. Alegre,et al.  Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test , 2008 .

[79]  R. Burt THE GENDER OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 1998 .

[80]  Alan Murray,et al.  Evaluating the innovation of the Internet of Things: Empirical evidence from the intellectual capital assessment , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[81]  D. Sharma,et al.  Embeddedness of innovation receivers in the multinational corporation: Effects on business performance , 2011 .

[82]  Cecilia Grieco,et al.  The role of the innovation catalyst in social innovation - an Italian case study , 2018 .

[83]  D. Vrontis,et al.  A model for testing the relationship between company’s size and performance: a cross country analysis , 2018 .

[84]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[85]  Jenny Darroch,et al.  Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[86]  Jens Mueller,et al.  Ambidextrous IT capabilities and business process performance: an empirical analysis , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[87]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .