A noble technique a using force-sensing resistor for immobilization-device quality assurance: A feasibility study

Many studies have reported that a patient can move even when an immobilization device is used. Researchers have developed an immobilization-device quality-assurance (QA) system that evaluates the validity of immobilization devices. The QA system consists of force-sensing-resistor (FSR) sensor units, an electric circuit, a signal conditioning device, and a control personal computer (PC) with in-house software. The QA system is designed to measure the force between an immobilization device and a patient’s skin by using the FSR sensor unit. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the QA system in radiation-exposure situations. When the FSR sensor unit was irradiated with a computed tomography (CT) beam and a treatment beam from a linear accelerator (LINAC), the stability of the output signal, the image artifact on the CT image, and changing the variation on the patient’s dose were tested. The results of this study demonstrate that this system is promising in that it performed within the error range (signal variation on CT beam < 0.30 kPa, root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the two CT images according to presence or absence of the FSR sensor unit < 15 HU, signal variation on the treatment beam < 0.15 kPa, and dose difference between the presence and the absence of the FSR sensor unit < 0.02%). Based on the obtained results, we will volunteer tests to investigate the clinical feasibility of the QA system.

[1]  G H Fletcher,et al.  The significance of residual disease after external irradiation of squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. , 1977, Radiology.

[2]  P. Rubin,et al.  Tumor persistence as a predictor of outcome after radiation therapy of head and neck cancers. , 1976, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  N.K. Rana,et al.  Application of Force Sensing Resistor (FSR) in Design of Pressure Scanning System for Plantar Pressure Measurement , 2009, 2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering.

[4]  A Dutreix,et al.  Radiotherapy of pelvic malignancies: impact of two types of rigid immobilisation devices on localisation errors. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  Feasibility study of patient motion monitoring by using tactile array sensors , 2015 .

[6]  Yelin Suh,et al.  Immobilization effect of air-injected blanket (AIB) for abdomen fixation. , 2005, Medical physics.

[7]  T Mizowaki,et al.  The effectiveness of an immobilization device in conformal radiotherapy for lung tumor: reduction of respiratory tumor movement and evaluation of the daily setup accuracy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  I. Lax,et al.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen. Methodological aspects. , 1994, Acta oncologica.

[9]  Wann-Yun Shieh,et al.  Development of a Portable Non-Invasive Swallowing and Respiration Assessment Device † , 2015, Sensors.

[10]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  B. Baumert,et al.  The use of a leg holder immobilisation device in 3D-conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Meina Liu,et al.  Lower Mortality Associated With Overweight in the U.S. National Health Interview Survey , 2016, Medicine.

[13]  Robert Timmerman,et al.  Frame-based immobilization and targeting for stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2007, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.