A new perforated core buckling restrained brace

Abstract The Perforated Core Buckling Restrained Brace (PCBRB) is a new energy dissipation device for the seismic design of buildings. Its core consists of a perforated steel yielding plate which is guided and partially stabilized by the restraining unit. The core is mechanized to obtain two yielding lateral bands which are connected by several equidistant stabilizing bridges. The lateral bands are designed to yield to axial forces, as conventional BRBs do, so the force and the displacement at the yielding point can be calculated by the usual expressions of conventional buckling restrained braces, based on uniform strain distribution. To distribute the stabilizing bridges along the core, an expression based on Euler’s formulation is proposed. Under this formulation two types of specimens have been designed and tested (Type I and Type II) using three different loading protocols. The Type I specimens exhibited a stable response, while the Type II specimens suffered a progressive loss of compression capacity produced by the local buckling. Finally, the hysteretic behaviour of the tested braces and a large scale brace has been analysed with an FEM model which considers the interaction between the core and the encasing member. The model reproduces the hysteretic response during the first cycles and the influence of friction on the axial strain distribution along the yielding core.

[1]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded, large-scale, planar and 3-d buckling-restrained braced frames , 2014 .

[2]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[3]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[4]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Buckling‐restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper , 2006 .

[5]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and test of gusset connections for buckling‐restrained braced frames , 2014 .

[6]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[7]  Peter Dusicka,et al.  Global Restraint in Ultra-Lightweight Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2013 .

[8]  X. Cahís,et al.  A new modular buckling restrained brace for seismic resistant buildings , 2013 .

[9]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Research and Application of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2004 .

[10]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Steel buckling‐restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses , 2012 .

[11]  Junho Lee,et al.  Cyclic test of buckling restrained braces composed of square steel rods and steel tube , 2012 .

[12]  Tsutomu Usami,et al.  Developing high‐performance aluminum alloy buckling‐restrained braces based on series of low‐cycle fatigue tests , 2012 .

[13]  Persson Theory and simulation of sliding friction. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[14]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .