Spatially Adaptive Regularization in Total Field Inversion for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Summary Adaptive Total Field Inversion is described for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction from total field data through a spatially adaptive suppression of shadow artifacts through spatially adaptive regularization. The regularization for shadow suppression consists of penalizing low-frequency components of susceptibility in regions of small susceptibility contrasts as estimated by R2∗ derived signal intensity. Compared with a conventional local field method and two previously proposed regularized total field inversion methods, improvements were demonstrated in phantoms and subjects without and with hemorrhages. This algorithm, named TFIR, demonstrates the lowest error in numerical and gadolinium phantom datasets. In COSMOS data, TFIR performs well in matching ground truth in high-susceptibility regions. For patient data, TFIR comes close to meeting the quality of the reference local field method and outperforms other total field techniques in both clinical scores and shadow reduction.

[1]  Wei Cao,et al.  A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2015, NeuroImage.

[2]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Differentiates between Blood Depositions and Calcifications in Patients with Glioblastoma , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  Guang Yang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) minimizes interference from cellular pathology in R2* estimation of liver iron concentration , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  In Vivo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) in Alzheimer's Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Yi Wang,et al.  Automated adaptive preconditioner for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Yi Wang,et al.  Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Xizi Song,et al.  A spatially adaptive total variation regularization method for electrical resistance tomography , 2015 .

[8]  Yi Wang,et al.  Unambiguous identification of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles through quantitative susceptibility mapping of the nonlinear response to magnetic fields. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Yi Wang,et al.  Improved subthalamic nucleus depiction with quantitative susceptibility mapping. , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  Yi Wang,et al.  Simultaneous Phase Unwrapping and Removal of Chemical Shift (SPURS) Using Graph Cuts: Application in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Yi Wang,et al.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Pascal Spincemaille,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain at two field strengths from two vendors , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Ildar Khalidov,et al.  Targeted near-IR hybrid magnetic nanoparticles for in vivo cancer therapy and imaging. , 2013, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[14]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Xin Li,et al.  Fine-Granularity and Spatially-Adaptive Regularization for Projection-Based Image Deblurring , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method , 2018, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Y Wang,et al.  Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  Andrew J. Walsh,et al.  Susceptibility phase imaging with comparison to R2* mapping of iron-rich deep grey matter , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Yi Wang,et al.  MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Duyn,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Single‐step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[23]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[24]  Jon Thacker,et al.  Evaluation of Iron Content in Human Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Pascal Spincemaille,et al.  Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy,et al.  Voxel spread function method for correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects in quantitative gradient‐echo‐based MRI , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.